Wigner-Eckart theorem in Stark effect

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the application of the Wigner-Eckart theorem in the context of the Stark effect, specifically for hydrogen's n = 2 states under a constant electric field. The energy levels split at ±3u (where u is the product of the Bohr radius and the electric field strength) and the absorption spectrum's frequencies can be calculated based on energy differences. The main challenge lies in understanding how x-polarized light interacts with the perturbed states and the implications of the Wigner-Eckart theorem when spherical symmetry is disrupted. The selection rules play a crucial role in determining the effects on the [21±1] states.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Wigner-Eckart theorem
  • Familiarity with the Stark effect in quantum mechanics
  • Knowledge of degenerate perturbation theory
  • Basic principles of quantum mechanics related to hydrogen atom states
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of the Wigner-Eckart theorem on selection rules in quantum mechanics
  • Explore the effects of electric fields on atomic energy levels in detail
  • Investigate the role of polarization in spectral line absorption
  • Learn about spherical vector operators and their applications in quantum mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, quantum mechanics students, and researchers interested in atomic spectroscopy and perturbation theory.

Goddar
Messages
202
Reaction score
16
Hi. I'm reviewing some past qualifying exams and stumbled on something i can't figure out, probably because I'm still confused about the Wigner-Eckart theorem..
So, the set-up is just degenerate perturbation theory for constant electric field along z on the n = 2 hydrogen states. That's a classic, so i don't have a problem with it: states [200] and [210] emerge in linear combinations, with energy levels split at ±3u (u = Bohr radius times eE) from the n = 2 level. [21±1] are unaffected.

Penultimate question is: "Assuming that the atom is in its ground state and the light is polarized in z- direction, determine frequencies of spectral lines in the absorption spectrum, which will be observed, and their relative strength"
That doesn't seem hard either: jumps from the ground state imply absorption of ΔE or ΔE±3u, where ΔE is the energy difference between ground state and n = 2; frequency is given by E = hf. Then ΔE absorption should be twice the intensity of any of the two others.

Finally the one I'm stuck on: "Can Stark effect be observed with x-polarized light? Give arguments based on Wigner- Eckart theorem"
First of all, what's the deal about x-polarized here and why does it make a difference?
Then, it seems like the electric field ruins the spherical symmetry so how can we use Wigner-Eckart at all?
Maybe just on the [21±1] states?
If we can use it, then how?...Is it the selection rules that prevent [21±1] from being affected?
Thank you in advance..
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Maybe this can help: a family of spherical vector operators with ##\ell = 1##
$$\mathbf{v}_{+1}=-\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(\mathbf{x} + i \mathbf{y})\,\quad \mathbf{v}_{-1}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(\mathbf{x} - i \mathbf{y})\,,\quad \mathbf{v}_0 = \mathbf{z}$$

You might be able to use something like
$$\mathbf{x} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \left( -\mathbf{v}_{+1} + \mathbf{v}_{-1}\right) \;,$$

since ##\mathbf{v}_{+1}## and ##\mathbf{v}_{+1}## can be used with the W-E theorem.
 
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K