Unraveling Weak Field Stark Effect in Hydrogen

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the Weak Field Stark Effect in hydrogen, specifically analyzing the n = 2 states and the energy level shifts due to a weak external electric field. The energy shift is defined as \mp \sqrt{3}a_0 e \epsilon, where a_0 is the Bohr radius, e is the electric charge, and \epsilon is the electric field. Participants express confusion regarding the derivation of the matrix elements and the construction of the perturbed Hamiltonian, emphasizing the need to clarify the added term to the unperturbed Hamiltonian and the significance of the matrix elements of the position operator z.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of degenerate perturbation theory
  • Familiarity with quantum mechanics concepts, particularly energy level shifts
  • Knowledge of matrix elements in quantum mechanics
  • Basic understanding of the Stark effect
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of matrix elements in quantum mechanics
  • Research the principles of degenerate perturbation theory in detail
  • Learn about the Stark effect and its implications in quantum systems
  • Examine the construction of perturbed Hamiltonians in quantum mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in quantum mechanics, particularly those studying atomic physics and the effects of external fields on energy levels in hydrogen.

PHamnett
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Considering the n = 2 states of hydrogen: In the absense of an external field, the four j = 1/2 states are degenerate. Using degenerate pertubation theory, I am supposed to show that for a very weak field the Stark effect shifts the energy levels by

\mp \sqrt{3}a_0 e \epsilon

where a_0 is the bohr radius, e is the electric charge and \epsilon is the electric field


The solutions state that we should get the following equations:
<1 1/2 1/2 | z | 0 1/2 1/2> = -\sqrt{1/3}<1 0 | z | 0 0>

and

<1 1/2 -1/2 | z | 0 1/2 -1/2> = \sqrt{1/3}<1 0 | z | 0 0>

and then from there a pertubed hamiltonian is constructed.

But to be honest, none of it seems to make sense and me and my friend do not know where even the first line of the solutions comes from. Yet alone the rest.
Any light that could be shed on the situation would be most appreciated.
Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


What term is being added to the unperturbed Hamiltonian? Start by figuring that out. Then it should be clear why you need to find the matrix elements of z.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
745
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K