Will a Not Passing Grade in a GE Course Affect My Chances for Graduate School?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the potential impact of receiving a not pass (NP) grade in a general education (GE) course on graduate school admissions. Participants explore the significance of this grade in the context of overall academic performance, research experience, and personal challenges faced by the original poster.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that a not pass grade may not be a significant barrier to graduate school admissions, especially if the applicant has strong research experience and performs well in their major courses.
  • Others argue that the NP could be a disadvantage in a competitive admissions process, particularly if other applicants have stronger academic records without failing grades.
  • A participant points out that graduate schools may question an applicant's commitment and ability to complete coursework if they fail a GE course, despite the workload or personal issues faced.
  • Concerns are raised about the importance of general education courses in developing skills necessary for academic and professional interactions across disciplines.
  • The original poster shares personal struggles with addiction and depression, questioning whether these circumstances would be viewed as valid reasons for academic weaknesses in a graduate school application.
  • Some participants acknowledge the complexity of personal challenges and their potential impact on academic performance, but do not reach a consensus on how graduate schools would interpret these circumstances.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the weight of a not pass grade in graduate school admissions. While some believe it may not be a major concern, others contend that it could negatively affect the applicant's chances, particularly in a competitive environment. The discussion remains unresolved regarding how personal circumstances might be perceived by admissions committees.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the subjective nature of graduate admissions decisions, noting that factors such as research experience, letters of recommendation, and the overall applicant pool can influence outcomes. There is also an acknowledgment of the potential stigma surrounding personal challenges and their impact on academic performance.

Thomas Brady
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
So i am currently going into my third year in the fall and this summer I'm taking a few courses and finally got my first opportunity to participate in some research. Problem is there is a good chance I will get a NP (not pass) in a GE class I am taking. I am going to a UC so an NP does not impact gpa. How much weight will gtad schools put on this considering I am doing some research and likely to do well in all the physics classes I am taking. I've had some personal issues over the last year which lead to some slight downswings in GPA as well but nothing worse than straight B's one quarter and I've improved since but this summer some unfortunate things have happened along with a large workload which led to me most likely getting an NP in this course. Again assuming I continue to do well in physics and research will this be a large factor in graduate school's considerations?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1) If we say it'll be a large factor, what would you do about it?
2) If I saw your transcript, I'd say it looks like you're not really interested in working hard if it doesn't really interest you.
 
1) Nothing I can do other than try to pass just wondering
2) I have done well in other GE courses but also why would a grad school care so much about that if I am going there to pursue specific research interests
 
Thomas Brady said:
1) Nothing I can do other than try to pass just wondering

OK, nothing you can do about it. No reason to let it bother you then.

2) I have done well in other GE courses but also why would a grad school care so much about that if I am going there to pursue specific research interests

Again, they don't care about the specifics of your GE course. But they might care that you only do well when you're interested in something. Obviously I have no idea how the grad school would react, but I'm just giving a possible way of seeing it.
 
I don't think it's a show stopper, but it will impact you somewhat. Remember graduate school admissions is usually a competitive process and you'll be competing against other students who did not fail their general education classes. How much weight that will be given depends on the committee members and what other factors are at play. If you're the only student in the pool who has two research publications and your references both state that you wrote those papers yourself, then it's not likely to be a factor. If on the other hand, you're one of three students who all have similar GPA and research experience and they only have one spot, having failed a course could be a decisive factor against you.

And there are a few reasons why general education courses are seen as important.

First, you chose to do them. I realize there is often a mandatory element, but remember you chose that particular program in the first place. So if you fail, it draws into question things like you're ability to complete a commitment that you've made. Sometimes there are perfectly acceptable reasons for failing. A large workload is not one of them.

Secondly, although graduate work focuses on a very specific field and project, you're still being trained to be an academic. Later in your career (or even as a student) you could end up on university committees that involve people from other academic disciplines and you need to be able to interact with them. That can be tough to do if you failed out of their 101 classes.

Third, once you enter the program, you essentially become an abmassador for the school and the program itself. They'll want to know that you're likely to be successful in all the things you go on to do afterward - not all of a which are going to be in your field.
 
Okay, valid points. So I've heard of the optional essay you may write for grad school discussing weaknesses in your application. Now this may be a bit personal, but basically, the main reason for the weaknesses in my application (i.e. the NP and some other not great grades) is an addiction to drugs, which was spawned by depression, which was spawned by my affiliation with people who had been deceiving/stealing from me and it really just put my mood in a terrible place because these were people I considered very close and they were my only friends at the time excluding one person so it was unfortunate. Anyway, the drug addiction is kind of what led me to be passionate about this stuff because I began to feel so purposeless and question things so much that I turned to physics/the study of the natural world because it was the only thing that seemed to capture the mysteriousness and beauty of life in such a natural way and it did not depend on people. Anyway, it is an odd story, but it took me about a year to really figure this out and then quit my drug addiction, and in fact this summer is when I finally quit cold turkey. I did decently well in school during the time excluding really this NP, but the point is, would grad schools even accept this as a valid reason/excuse for poor grades or would it just be viewed as something I brought upon myself, which it mostly is.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
7K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K