Admissions Will a Not Passing Grade in a GE Course Affect My Chances for Graduate School?

AI Thread Summary
A not passing grade in a general education (GE) course may not significantly impact graduate school admissions, especially if the applicant has strong research experience and performs well in their major courses. However, admissions committees may consider the NP as a reflection of commitment and ability to handle responsibilities, particularly in a competitive applicant pool. While personal challenges, such as overcoming addiction, can provide context for academic struggles, they may not be viewed as valid excuses by all committees. Graduate schools typically value well-rounded candidates who demonstrate resilience and the ability to succeed across various disciplines. Ultimately, the impact of an NP will vary based on the overall strength of the application and the specific preferences of the admissions committee.
Thomas Brady
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
So i am currently going into my third year in the fall and this summer I'm taking a few courses and finally got my first opportunity to participate in some research. Problem is there is a good chance I will get a NP (not pass) in a GE class I am taking. I am going to a UC so an NP does not impact gpa. How much weight will gtad schools put on this considering I am doing some research and likely to do well in all the physics classes I am taking. I've had some personal issues over the last year which lead to some slight downswings in GPA as well but nothing worse than straight B's one quarter and I've improved since but this summer some unfortunate things have happened along with a large workload which led to me most likely getting an NP in this course. Again assuming I continue to do well in physics and research will this be a large factor in graduate school's considerations?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1) If we say it'll be a large factor, what would you do about it?
2) If I saw your transcript, I'd say it looks like you're not really interested in working hard if it doesn't really interest you.
 
1) Nothing I can do other than try to pass just wondering
2) I have done well in other GE courses but also why would a grad school care so much about that if I am going there to pursue specific research interests
 
Thomas Brady said:
1) Nothing I can do other than try to pass just wondering

OK, nothing you can do about it. No reason to let it bother you then.

2) I have done well in other GE courses but also why would a grad school care so much about that if I am going there to pursue specific research interests

Again, they don't care about the specifics of your GE course. But they might care that you only do well when you're interested in something. Obviously I have no idea how the grad school would react, but I'm just giving a possible way of seeing it.
 
I don't think it's a show stopper, but it will impact you somewhat. Remember graduate school admissions is usually a competitive process and you'll be competing against other students who did not fail their general education classes. How much weight that will be given depends on the committee members and what other factors are at play. If you're the only student in the pool who has two research publications and your references both state that you wrote those papers yourself, then it's not likely to be a factor. If on the other hand, you're one of three students who all have similar GPA and research experience and they only have one spot, having failed a course could be a decisive factor against you.

And there are a few reasons why general education courses are seen as important.

First, you chose to do them. I realize there is often a mandatory element, but remember you chose that particular program in the first place. So if you fail, it draws into question things like you're ability to complete a commitment that you've made. Sometimes there are perfectly acceptable reasons for failing. A large workload is not one of them.

Secondly, although graduate work focuses on a very specific field and project, you're still being trained to be an academic. Later in your career (or even as a student) you could end up on university committees that involve people from other academic disciplines and you need to be able to interact with them. That can be tough to do if you failed out of their 101 classes.

Third, once you enter the program, you essentially become an abmassador for the school and the program itself. They'll want to know that you're likely to be successful in all the things you go on to do afterward - not all of a which are going to be in your field.
 
Okay, valid points. So I've heard of the optional essay you may write for grad school discussing weaknesses in your application. Now this may be a bit personal, but basically, the main reason for the weaknesses in my application (i.e. the NP and some other not great grades) is an addiction to drugs, which was spawned by depression, which was spawned by my affiliation with people who had been deceiving/stealing from me and it really just put my mood in a terrible place because these were people I considered very close and they were my only friends at the time excluding one person so it was unfortunate. Anyway, the drug addiction is kind of what led me to be passionate about this stuff because I began to feel so purposeless and question things so much that I turned to physics/the study of the natural world because it was the only thing that seemed to capture the mysteriousness and beauty of life in such a natural way and it did not depend on people. Anyway, it is an odd story, but it took me about a year to really figure this out and then quit my drug addiction, and in fact this summer is when I finally quit cold turkey. I did decently well in school during the time excluding really this NP, but the point is, would grad schools even accept this as a valid reason/excuse for poor grades or would it just be viewed as something I brought upon myself, which it mostly is.
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
780
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
32
Views
3K
Back
Top