Will a Slow Decrease in Dark Energy Density Alter the Fate of the Universe?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the implications of a slow decrease in dark energy density for the fate of the universe. Participants explore theoretical scenarios regarding the dominance of dark energy compared to matter and the potential outcomes for cosmic expansion.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question whether a slow decrease in dark energy density would alter the future dominance of energy density in the universe.
  • Others propose that the outcome may depend on the rate of decrease relative to the densities of normal and dark matter.
  • A participant suggests that if dark energy decreases faster than 1/a^2, the effect of spatial curvature on expansion will become significant, potentially leading to different fates for the universe.
  • It is noted that as long as dark energy density decreases more slowly than 1/a^2, it will dominate, leading to perpetual expansion, albeit at a slower rate.
  • There is a question about whether the universe will continue to accelerate if it expands more slowly, to which a participant responds affirmatively, contingent on the rate of energy density reduction.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of dark energy density changes, with no consensus reached on how these changes will affect the ultimate fate of the universe.

Contextual Notes

The discussion involves assumptions about the rates of change in dark energy density and their relationship to spatial curvature, which remain unresolved.

Ranku
Messages
434
Reaction score
18
If dark energy density were to be very slowly decreasing, how will the fate of the universe be any different from the energy density being constant? Would not the energy density be completely dominant in the future even if it were to be very slowly decreasing?
 
Space news on Phys.org
Ranku said:
Would not the energy density be completely dominant in the future even if it were to be very slowly decreasing?

I think that may depend on how quickly is decreases. If it decreases slower than the density of normal and dark matter, the outcome is likely to be the same as if it wasn't decreasing at all. But I confess I am not up to speed on all the details, so I could be incorrect.
 
Drakkith said:
I think that may depend on how quickly is decreases. If it decreases slower than the density of normal and dark matter, the outcome is likely to be the same as if it wasn't decreasing at all. But I confess I am not up to speed on all the details, so I could be incorrect.
The critical question is whether it ends up decreasing faster than [itex]1/a^2[/itex] or not.

If the dark energy at some point starts decreasing faster than [itex]1/a^2[/itex] (it definitely isn't now), then the effect of the spatial curvature on the expansion will grow over time. Eventually the universe will either continue to expand forever or recollapse back on itself dependent upon whether the spatial curvature is slightly positive or slightly negative.

But as long as the dark energy density decreases more slowly than [itex]1/a^2[/itex], it will always dominate over the curvature and the universe will expand forever. It will expand more slowly, and the horizon will be much larger. But it will keep expanding.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Drakkith
Chalnoth said:
But as long as the dark energy density decreases more slowly than [itex]1/a^2[/itex], it will always dominate over the curvature and the universe will expand forever. It will expand more slowly, and the horizon will be much larger. But it will keep expanding.
Will it continue accelerating, even if expanding more slowly?
 
Ranku said:
Will it continue accelerating, even if expanding more slowly?
Yes, as long as the energy density reduces more slowly than this, objects within the universe will continue to accelerate away from one another.
 
Thank you for clarifying.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K