Will Latex make a comeback someday?

  • Thread starter Thread starter nahya
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mind
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of electric field concepts involving point charges and the use of LaTeX for mathematical notation. Participants explore the calculations related to electric fields and forces between charges.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calculation of the net electric field from two point charges, including the use of vector notation and the significance of charge types. Questions arise regarding the setup of the problem and the use of absolute values in calculations.

Discussion Status

Some participants have shared their calculations and reasoning, while others have raised questions about specific steps and assumptions. There is acknowledgment of a potential resolution, but no explicit consensus has been reached.

Contextual Notes

One participant mentions issues with LaTeX formatting, which may affect the clarity of mathematical expressions. Additionally, there is a reference to the types of resulting charges, indicating a consideration of charge interactions.

nahya
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
never mind. sorry :)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't know where my calculator is, so this might be wrong... but the theory should be there.

Qa
Qb
are point charges.

Thus:
\vec E = \frac{kq}{r^2}\hat r

\vec r_{PQa} = \left[\begin{array}{c} 11 \cross 10^2 m \\ 0 \\ 0 \end{array} \right]

\vec r_{PQb} = \left[ \begin{array}{c} (11+22) \times 10^2 m \\ 0 \\ 0 \end{array} \right]

r_{PQa} = |vec r_{PQa}| = \sqrt{(11\times 10^2 m)^2+(0)^2+(0)^2}=11\times 10^2m

r_{PQb}=33\times 10^2 m

\vec E_{net} = \vec E_{Qa} + \vec E_{Qb} = \frac{kQa}{r_{pQa}^2}\hat r_{Qa} + \frac{kQb}{r_{{pQb}^2}\hat r_{Qb}

Notice that:
\hat r_{Qa}=\hat r_{Qb} = \hat i = \left[ \begin{array}{c} 1 \\ 0 \\ 0 \end{array} \right]

Thus:
\vec E_{net} = k\hat i \left(\frac{4\times 10^{-6}}{(11 \times 10^2 m)^2} + \frac{-1 \times 10^{-6}}{33 \times 10^2 m}\right)

After you plug in k and cross of the units you get:
\vec E = \hat i \left((9\times 10^9) \frac{4\times 10^{-6}}{(11 \times 10^2 m)^2} + \frac{-1 \times 10^{-6}}{33 \times 10^2 m}\right)\fraq{N}{C}

Also remember that you can drop the vector notation for \vec E_{net} [/tex] by taking the magnitude of it. And since you only have one component E_{net} is just equal to whatever that calculation is above. Sorry, I really don't feel like doing that by hand... not that it's hard. I'm just too lazy to do it.<br /> <br /> For the second part of your question recall that: <br /> \vec F_{12} = \frac{kq_1 q_2}{r^2}\hat r<br /> <br /> I think you can figure it out from what I showed you above. I gave a very rigrious calculation, not skipping many steps. I find it easier just to think about most questions like this as three dimensional questions, and just do a little bit more steps with the vector calculus.
 
well.. the latex thing isn't working atm, i guess. ^^
i solved the problem, however. i just didn't think about the types of the resulting charges.
 
Why are you taking the absolute value? How are you setting up the problem for the force?
 
Cool. Well I guess you're good.

Maybe some day Latex will come back :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
942
  • · Replies 70 ·
3
Replies
70
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K