marlon
- 3,779
- 11
HAHA LOVE IT
marlon
Last edited by a moderator:
The discussion centers around the potential impact of judicial setbacks on Nicolas Sarkozy's labor reforms in France, particularly focusing on the Paris Appeals Court's ruling against the "hire-and-fire" job contract known as the CNE. The conversation touches on the implications for labor rights, unemployment, and the political landscape surrounding these reforms.
Participants exhibit a mix of humorous commentary and serious concerns regarding the labor reforms. There is no clear consensus on Sarkozy's effectiveness or the implications of the court ruling, indicating a range of opinions and interpretations.
The discussion reflects a blend of political commentary and personal observations, with some statements relying on assumptions about Sarkozy's character and the political climate in France. The implications of the court ruling remain uncertain, as participants speculate on its potential effects on labor negotiations.
marlon said:
HAHA LOVE IT
marlon
Art said:I see the Belgian press who suggested he was drunk had to apologise. Apparently Sarkozy is a non-drinker. So maybe he was just intoxicated by all his new found power![]()
It's to make it more difficult for an assassin to shoot himAstronuc said:One thing about Sarkozy, he seems to bob his head a lot or move it side to side. He certainly doesn't sit still.
Astronuc said:Makes me wish I were fluent in French.
One thing about Sarkozy, he seems to bob his head a lot or move it side to side. He certainly doesn't sit still.
NICOLAS Sarkozy's ambitious plan to reform France's restrictive labour system could face difficulties after the Paris Appeals Court on Friday struck down a "hire-and-fire" job contract introduced two years ago.
The contract, known as the CNE, or "new recruit contract" was adopted by the previous centre-right government as part of an attempt to cut unemployment and inject flexibility into the labour market.
The Appeals court said the contract, by allowing small companies to fire employees without justification at any time during a two year trial period, violated international laws and basic labour rights.
"In the fight against unemployment the protection of staff in their jobs seems to be at least as relevant as the ease given to employers to sack them," the court said.
The ruling could have serious implications for the French president's reform agenda. Unions are likely to be emboldened by the decision as they enter into negotiations with employers over labour market reform.
Jacques Chirac, the former French president, and Dominique de Villepin, the then prime minister, were forced into a humiliating climb-down over a youth version of the CNE last year after mass street demonstrations by students and unions.
. . . .