Can Two Vehicles Avoid Collision in a Wet Tunnel?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 3.14159265358979
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Collision
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving two vehicles in a wet tunnel, specifically analyzing the potential for a collision between a fast-moving car and a slow-moving van. The problem involves concepts from kinematics, including acceleration, distance, and time calculations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the equations of motion for both vehicles, attempting to determine if and when a collision occurs. There are discussions about the use of quadratic equations and the implications of multiple solutions. Some participants question the assumptions made regarding constant acceleration and the physical interpretation of the results.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants sharing their calculations and questioning the validity of their approaches. There is no explicit consensus on the correct interpretation of the results, but various lines of reasoning are being explored, including the conditions under which a collision might occur.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the constraints of the problem, such as the effects of wet conditions on braking and the assumption of constant acceleration, which may not hold true in a collision scenario.

3.14159265358979
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
Speedy Sue, driving at 30 m/s, enters a one-lane tunnel. She then observes a slow moving van 155 m ahead traveling at 5 m/s. She applies her brakes but can accelerate only at -2.0 m/s^2 because the road is wet. Will there be a collision? If yes, determine how far into the tunnel and what time the collision occurs. If no, determine the distance of closest approach between sues car and the van.

here's my greatest guess...

i'm going to assume they collide...(if i can do that)

S----------- 155 m -----------V--------x---------C

where...
S = sues starting position
V = the vans starting position
x = the distance traveled by the van
c = collision


SUE:
d = vt + 1/2at^{2}
155+y = 30t - t^{2}
y = 30t - t^{2} - 155

VAN:
d = vt + 1/2at^{2}
y = 5t

therefore...

30t - t^{2} - 155 = 5t
t^{2} - 25t + 155 = 0

using the quadratic formula, i got

t = 13.62 and t = 11.38 seconds (approx.)

now which one do i accept? am i doing this right or the smartest way? thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
my mistake...i defined the variable as x, but used y in my solution...

S----------- 155 m -----------V--------y---------C

where...
S = sues starting position
V = the vans starting position
y = the distance traveled by the van
c = collision

any suggestions/help would be greatly appreciated...
 
Position = A/2t^2 + Vi*t + Pi

Where
A = acceleration
Vi = velocity initial
P = position initial
t = time

so:
Sue’s position equation is: -2/2t^2 + 30t + 0
The van’s position (assuming the van has a constant acceleration) equation is: 0/2t^2 + 5t + 155

The question you are being asked is when their positions are equal, to get that you need to set their positions equations equal to each other. -2/2t^2 + 30t = 5t + 155

Are there any real solutions to that quadratic equation? And if they are, what do those solutions signify?
 
isn't that what i did? the answer i got was t = 13.62 and t = 11.38 seconds (approx.). but how does that make any sense? how can they intersect twice? shouldn't i get a negative answer that i could discard? thanks for the quick reply joh
 
In my opinion the best way to do this is to calculate the distance Sue will cover when she accelerates negatively, and then check the distance covered by the truck, and compare both distances. I mean if Sue covers a distance D [D1+D2] and the truck covers a distance [D2] and Sue distance is > the distance of the truck + 155, then it hit the truck, don't you agree?

If you like my idea, here's a hint:
What speed Sue at least should have to avoid collision?
 
Last edited:
The equation assumes constant acceleration while in reality she is going to stop accelerating once she hits the truck.

Basically that equation works like they are driving next to each other. In that case they would have equal distances twice, she would pass him, and then he would pass her.

But in your scenario that isn’t the case once they collide they stop. So the smaller time value.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K