Will We Ever Utilize Dyson Spheres?

  • Thread starter KonradKorzenowski
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Spheres
In summary, the idea of using Dyson spheres to collect solar energy is not feasible due to the large amount of material and energy required to build them. Alternative ideas such as Larry Niven's Ringworld or using a smaller belt of solar cells within Mercury's orbit may be more plausible. Even with advanced nanotechnology, it would still be difficult to construct a Dyson sphere due to the limitations of the laws of physics and the availability of materials in our solar system.
  • #36
what does [tex]{\Delta}x{\Delta}{\rho}{\geq}\frac{\hbar}{2}[/tex] have to do with [tex]F=ma[/tex]?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #37
PhysicsEnthusiast said:
"The more precisely the POSITION is determined, the less precisely the MOMENTUM is known".
What a novel and disturbing concept!
The fact is, there are definite practical limitations to the effects of uncertainty. It's essentially non-existent on a macroscopic scale.
Unless I missed something along the line, no one has said that Dyson spheres are impossible. The question is in whether or not they would be practical. If, for instance, we would have to gather material from another stellar system we'd might as well just move there.
 
  • #38
Danger said:
Unless I missed something along the line, no one has said that Dyson spheres are impossible. The question is in whether or not they would be practical. If, for instance, we would have to gather material from another stellar system we'd might as well just move there.

The point of them would be living space and/or gathering all the output of a single star. The material to build a suprastellar shell, at least a lot of them around a star, might have to come from other star systems. However, by building them you get millions to billions of times the living space of Earth. How many star systems would one have to move humans to in order to equal that? A lot of teraforming would be involved with moving to billions of systems. There probably aren't Earths ready "made" in every system! Let's say we found another Earth nearby though. It would have life of its own(I'd have to in order to fit the name of Earth) We could take the planet for ourselves; but unless we have to take the planet though, wouldn't it be better to preserve it as a Galactic Park?
 

Similar threads

  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
26
Views
711
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • Classical Physics
Replies
6
Views
336
Replies
207
Views
3K
Back
Top