MHB Word problem: distance traveled

NotaMathPerson
Messages
82
Reaction score
0
Here' s my attempt

$r=$revolution taken by first
$r+c=$ revolutiin taken by 2nd

$d=a(r+c)$ distance covered by first (1)
$d=br$ distance covered by 2nd (2)

$br=a(r+c)$ solving for r $r=\frac{ac}{b-a}$ and plug into (2)

I get $a=\frac{abc}{b-a}$ this answers agrees with the key answer in the book.

But my question is why do I get different answer when I plug $r$ to eqn. (1)?

Thanks!
 

Attachments

  • Q26hallXVI.jpg
    Q26hallXVI.jpg
    12.1 KB · Views: 87
Mathematics news on Phys.org
NotaMathPerson said:
Here' s my attempt

$r=$revolution taken by first
$r+c=$ revolutiin taken by 2nd

$d=a(r+c)$ distance covered by first (1)
$d=br$ distance covered by 2nd (2)

$br=a(r+c)$ solving for r $r=\frac{ac}{b-a}$ and plug into (2)

I get $a=\frac{abc}{b-a}$ this answers agrees with the key answer in the book.

You mean $d=\frac{abc}{b-a}$, don't you?
NotaMathPerson said:
But my question is why do I get different answer when I plug $r$ to eqn. (1)?

Plugging $r$ into (1) we get the following:
$$d=a(r+c) =a\left (\frac{ac}{b-a}+c\right )=a\left (\frac{ac+c(b-a)}{b-a}\right )=a\frac{ac+cb-ac}{b-a}=a\frac{bc}{b-a}=\frac{abc}{b-a}$$

So, we get the same result.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top