MHB Word Problem for slope intercept graph equation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a word problem related to a shipping cost function based on weight. The key points include identifying the ordered pairs (4, 3.55) and (6, 4.35) to determine the slope, which is calculated as 0.4. Participants explain how to use the point-slope form of a linear equation to derive the cost function, emphasizing that the equation can be expressed as c = aw + b. The process involves setting up two equations based on the given points and solving for the coefficients a and b. The conversation highlights the steps necessary to create the equation for the shipping cost based on weight.
mhester88
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I have this word problem that is asking for two different answers, the equation for the data and to calculate the shipping rate. I'm not understanding how to address either of the questions. Will someone please help me with this answer?

IMG-6771.jpg
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
shipping cost is dependent on weight

an ordered pair for the cost function would be $(w, c)$ where $w$ is the weight (the independent variable), and $c$ is the cost (the dependent variable

you are given two such ordered pairs, $(4, 3.55)$ and $(6, 4.35)$

find the slope between those two given points, then use the point-slope form of a linear equation to get the cost function
 
Thank you for your response. If I'm understanding this correctly, then the slope would be 0.4. I'm still confused on how to write the equation using c and w. I'm not sure how to even begin creating the equation.
 
mhester88 said:
Thank you for your response. If I'm understanding this correctly, then the slope would be 0.4. I'm still confused on how to write the equation using c and w. I'm not sure how to even begin creating the equation.

point-slope form of a linear equation ...

$y - y_1 = m(x - x_1)$

where $(x_1,y_1)$ is a point on the line and $m$ is the slope

... requires one point (you have two), and the slope, $m$.

remember, y is the cost (you can use c instead) and x is the weight (you can use w instead)

$c - c_1 = m(w - w_1)$
 
Any (non-vertical) line has equation c= aw+ b for some numbers, a and b. You are told that when the weight, w, is 4 lb. the cost, c, is \$3.55 so 3.55= a(4)+ b. You are told that when the weight, w, is 6 lb. the cost, c, is \$4.35 so 4.35= a(6)+ b.

Solve the two equations, 4a+ b= 3.55 and 6a+ b= 4.35, for a and b. I recommend you subtract the first equation from the second to eliminate b.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top