Worm Holes and gravitational microlensing

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the feasibility of locating the end of a wormhole using gravitational microlensing, exploring both theoretical implications and speculative scenarios within the context of science fiction. Participants engage with the underlying assumptions about wormholes and their existence, as well as the rules governing discussions in the forum.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Meta-discussion
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Speculative reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question the foundational assumption that wormholes exist in nature, suggesting that this premise is not currently supported by empirical evidence.
  • Others propose that if wormholes were to exist, gravitational microlensing could potentially be a method for their detection, though specifics on methodology are not fully developed.
  • A participant emphasizes the need for the original poster (OP) to clarify their physical model and motivations behind the question to facilitate more focused discussion.
  • There is a suggestion to consider the mass and density of wormholes in relation to their ability to bend light, drawing parallels to black holes as a means of analysis.
  • Some participants express confusion regarding the appropriateness of the forum for speculative ideas versus established science fiction narratives.
  • Definitions and conceptual frameworks of wormholes are discussed, with references to their mathematical grounding in general relativity, contrasting with more fantastical interpretations.
  • Concerns are raised about the OP's broad question, indicating that a more specific inquiry would be necessary for meaningful engagement.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally do not agree on the existence of wormholes, with some asserting that they are purely theoretical constructs while others entertain their potential existence within speculative contexts. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the specifics of how gravitational microlensing could be applied to wormholes.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the lack of consensus on the existence of wormholes and the varying interpretations of their properties. The discussion also reflects uncertainty about the rules governing speculative discussions in the forum, which may affect the direction of the conversation.

Who May Find This Useful

Readers interested in the intersection of theoretical physics and science fiction writing, as well as those exploring speculative concepts related to wormholes and gravitational lensing.

  • #31
You could take the Morris-Thorne wormhole, but it's a vacuum solution... like all of them (I think). At that point you should be lax if you want to write the novel.

M. S. Morris and K. S. Thorne, “Wormholes in spacetime and their use
for interstellar travel: A tool for teaching General Relativity”, Am. J.
Phys. 56, 395 (1988).

https://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0302049

Now that I think about it, have you considered copying the movie Interstellar at certain points? It is a good reference for what you are looking for
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Typical wormhole idea is very sci-fi. Compare to 'time-travel' sci-fi, and an atomic clock verifying relativity. What is looking for a wormhole? It is a fictional idea. A wormhole is more likely to be tiny, compared to the sci-fi idea of a wormhole. Sci-fi idea is like millions of light years across space. More like the observed distances in Einstein rings, adjacent Galaxy, or far more tiny than one Galaxy.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
6K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K