Wormhole proper radial distance

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter PLuz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Radial Wormhole
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the proper radial distance in the context of wormholes, specifically referencing the article by Morris and Thorne. The key point is the requirement that the expression \(1 - \frac{b(r)}{r} \geq 0\) must hold throughout spacetime to ensure that the proper radial distance \(l(r)\) remains finite. The conversation highlights the implications of this condition, particularly when the quantity approaches zero, which leads to an infinite derivative of the proper radial distance. This indicates that while the proper radial distance can be finite, its behavior near the throat of the wormhole is critical for understanding its properties.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of general relativity concepts
  • Familiarity with wormhole physics
  • Knowledge of mathematical expressions involving limits and derivatives
  • Ability to interpret scientific literature, specifically in theoretical physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of the Morris-Thorne wormhole metrics
  • Learn about the mathematical treatment of proper distances in general relativity
  • Explore the concept of infinite derivatives in calculus
  • Investigate the conditions for stability in wormhole geometries
USEFUL FOR

The discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, students of general relativity, and anyone interested in the mathematical foundations of wormhole physics and their implications for spacetime structure.

PLuz
Messages
60
Reaction score
0
I've been reading the excellent article from Morris and Thorne: "Wormholes in spacetime and their use for interstellar travel a tool for teaching general relativity" and there's something I don't quite get it. In the ninth page the authors state:
"[...] in the general case, the radial coordinate r is ill behaved near the throat; but the proper radial distance l(r)=\pm \int_{b_0}^{r}\frac{dr'}{(1-b(r')/r')^{\frac{1}{2}}} must be well behaved everywhere;i.e., we must require that l(r) is finite throughout spacetime, which also implies that 1-\frac{b(r)}{r}\geqslant 0 throughout spacetime."

After this very long transcript. My actual question is: why the greater or equal in the last expression? If the quantity is zero the proper radial distance isn't finite...
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
PLuz said:
My actual question is: why the greater and equal in the last expression? If the quantity is zero the proper radial distance isn't finite...
No, it would mean the derivative of the proper radial distance dl(r)/dr is infinite. There are plenty examples of functions that remain finite even though their derivative is infinite.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K