Worst Electrical Conductor Metal: What to Know?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter RestlessMind
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Conductor Metal
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around identifying the worst electrical conductor among metals, including both elemental metals and alloys. Participants explore various materials, their conductivity, and practical considerations regarding availability and applications.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants inquire about the definition of "metal" and whether it includes alloys.
  • One participant cites a list claiming plutonium is the worst metallic conductor, but others express a preference for more readily available materials.
  • There is a discussion about the conductivity of metals like titanium, mercury, and lead, with varying opinions on their availability.
  • Participants mention the resistivity of aluminum versus aluminum oxide, suggesting that surface oxidation can affect conductivity.
  • Some argue that no metals or alloys are very poor conductors due to their free electron nature, suggesting that insulators may be more appropriate for applications requiring low conductivity.
  • There is a mention of nichrome as a material used for heating elements, highlighting its composition and electrical characteristics.
  • Participants discuss the hardness of metals versus ceramics, with suggestions for using ceramics as insulators in various applications.
  • Some express curiosity about the practical applications of materials that do not conduct electricity well.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the worst electrical conductor, with multiple competing views on the definitions and characteristics of metals and alloys. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best options for low conductivity materials.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include varying definitions of "readily available," assumptions about the properties of metals versus ceramics, and the context of specific applications for low conductivity materials.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to individuals exploring materials science, electrical engineering, or those seeking practical applications for low conductivity materials.

RestlessMind
Messages
173
Reaction score
0
Does anybody happen to know what readily-available metal is the worst electrical conductor?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
By metal, do you mean an element (e.g. Tungsten) or does that also include alloys?
 
Oh alloys count. For example if steel was it, then I would accept that.
 
Er, I was actually hoping for a more readily-available suggestion.
 
Draven said:
Er, I was actually hoping for a more readily-available suggestion.

I'm sure that in 1985 plutonium is available at every corner drug store, but in 1955 it's a little hard to come by.
 

Attachments

  • cornerdrugstore.jpg
    cornerdrugstore.jpg
    40.3 KB · Views: 1,074
Haha, excellent reference. :P I can't believe I forgot that!
 
Yeah but seriously you really are not going to find a common elemental metal that is a bad conductor. Look at the list, I think the best you could do is titanium and that is only around 100 times less conductive than copper. I'm not aware of any really non-conductive metal alloys either but that's just ignorance. What about forming an oxide layer on the surface of the metal? For example, aluminum oxide is resistive compared to alumin(i)um. According to a random website I found, so you know it must be right (take that CRC), aluminum has a resistivity of 0.00000270 ohm-cm, alumina has a resistivity of 2.5e6 ohm-cm.

Of course the trick would be to form the layer of alumina on the aluminum. Sure, time will do this naturally but who has the patience? You could speed up the process by grinding up the aluminum with iron oxide shavings and then providing the appropriate starting energy by a lit strip of magnesium. Now the gross expulsion of energy in the process is usually undesirable (and unconfinable...) though...
 
Or I could just stick with plastic. This is good information though.
 
  • #10
Draven said:
Or I could just stick with plastic. This is good information though.

Plastic is not a "conductor metal".

Zz.
 
  • #11
ZapperZ said:
Plastic is not a "conductor metal".

Nitpicker :devil:
 
  • #12
Mercury is quite a bad conductor, as is lead. Whether these fall into the category of "readily available" or not is up to you.
 
  • #13
Nichrome, 65 to 88 the resistivity of Cu.
 
Last edited:
  • #14
Born2bwire said:
I'm sure that in 1985 plutonium is available at every corner drug store, but in 1955 it's a little hard to come by.
Oh snap! Awesome reference! Who would have thunk conditions would conflagrate just so to make it relevant!
 
  • #15
Thank you, Zapper, for reminding me that plastic is not a metal. I'm quite aware of that. :|
 
  • #16
How do you define readily available?
 
  • #17
Able to buy it.
 
  • #18
Draven said:
Oh alloys count. For example if steel was it, then I would accept that.

But then the question is meaningless. The definition of a metal is a material that has free electrons; i.e. there are no metals or metallic alloys that are VERY bad conductors.
(not counting "exotic" materials such as Mott insulators and superinsulators; which are not really metallic anyway).

If you need a bad conductor (i.e. an insulator) you should just use an insulator of some sort.
Note also that most "metallic" properties (i.e good thermal conductors; the fact that metals are generally "shiny" etc) are only there because of the free electrons; meaning there is e.g. no such thing as a metal that is a good electric conductor but a bad thermal conductor (the exception being superconductors; but they are -again- not really metals).
 
  • #19
Er, okay then. I was just looking for something hard like metal that didn't conduct very well.
 
  • #20
Are you just looking for something to be used as a heating element? Then definitely just go with nichrome wire. Mainly nickel but with a large amount of chromium (15ish%). It's what I've used in the past to heat things up, but you need a pretty good power supply that can put out quite a bit of current depending on what you want to do.

Just remember the magic rule...

Twinkle, Twinkle, Little Star, Power = I Squared R!
 
  • #21
Actually, I was just curious about this. I imagine that there could be some applications where a tough material that does not conduct electricity would be useful.

Cute song ^^
 
Last edited:
  • #22
Metals are not hard. They are generally quite soft which is why metal surfaces are often protected using ceramics such as titanium oxide (using in e.g. frying pans to avoid scratching etc).
If you need a hard material you should use a ceramic such a quartz (silicon-oxide) or alumina (aluminium oxide). Note, however, that these are quite brittle.
 
  • #23
Well then, hard and not brittle. :P
 
  • #24
What f95toli said. For good hard insulators ceramics are great. Pretty much all we use in high vacuum environments. Teflon coated wires work great too but can't be heated like ceramics can.

Also fired alumina is extremely hard and I've never actually broken or sheared a piece. I first realized this as an intern when i deposited saw blade on it trying to cut off a piece :) I've always had a problem with the unfired stuff being very brittle.

For a machinable ceramic insulator I've always used Macor: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MACOR

But unless someone is buying it for you it's quite expensive.
 
  • #25
Haha, I see.

Well thanks for the info guys. =)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
885
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K