Worst person to be stranded out at sea on a lifeboat with

  • Thread starter Thread starter 0TheSwerve0
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around humorous and hypothetical scenarios regarding the worst person to be stranded with on a lifeboat at sea. Participants explore various traits and characteristics that would make someone undesirable as a companion in such a situation, touching on themes of personality, physical attributes, and social dynamics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that being stranded with someone who doesn't speak the same language could be problematic, while others wonder if it might be better.
  • Several participants mention personal relationships, such as a mother-in-law or an ex-girlfriend, as undesirable companions.
  • There are humorous suggestions about specific individuals, like Madonna in the 80s or fictional characters like Hannibal Lecter.
  • Concerns about physical attributes are raised, such as being stranded with a thin person or someone with osteoporosis, as they might not be able to contribute to survival efforts.
  • Some participants express that a talkative or overly eager person could be annoying or detrimental in a survival situation.
  • There are anecdotes shared about personal experiences with siblings and friends that highlight the challenges of being stranded with certain personalities.
  • Discussions about using others as food in extreme situations arise, with some participants joking about the morality of such actions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally express a variety of competing views on who would be the worst person to be stranded with, with no clear consensus emerging. The discussion remains light-hearted and speculative, with many humorous contributions.

Contextual Notes

Participants' suggestions often rely on personal anecdotes and humorous exaggerations, reflecting individual preferences and experiences rather than established criteria for survival situations.

Who May Find This Useful

Readers interested in humorous discussions about social dynamics, survival scenarios, or light-hearted debates may find this thread engaging.

  • #31
Moonbear said:
I don't know, that might not be so bad...I probably wouldn't feel so guilty about having to use him for food. :biggrin:
I NEVER THOUGHT ABOUT USING PEOPLE AS FOOD. I want the giant back. :biggrin:

The Bob (2004 ©)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Haha, on that note. If we were playing survivor, who would you vote off first?
 
  • #33
0TheSwerve0 said:
Haha, on that note. If we were playing survivor, who would you vote off first?


When we vote them off, do we get to sacrifice them to the volcano god?

Cause that would definitely change things...
 
  • #34
franznietzsche said:
When we vote them off, do we get to sacrifice them to the volcano god?

Cause that would definitely change things...
It could change things. We could torture the voted-off by removing their eyes over a pool of molten lava or we could cut their throats and eat them with a straw until they die and then eat them with meat balls and spaghetti.

I would vote for... erm... the... same person as before.

The Bob (2004 ©)
 
  • #35
Anything goes, we'll make it a Lord of the Flies type survivor :eek:
 
  • #36
Anyone with an irritating nervous laugh. That would really hack me off.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
Replies
40
Views
5K
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K