Would a worldwide quarantine help? --moved to general discussion

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

A two-week worldwide lockdown could significantly reduce the spread of Covid-19, particularly by limiting symptomless transmission. However, the effectiveness of such a measure is contingent on public compliance and regional coordination, as evidenced by past lockdowns in the US and other countries. The discussion highlights that while a lockdown may provide temporary relief, it is not a sustainable long-term solution, especially in the face of vaccine hesitancy and varying public attitudes towards health measures. Countries like Taiwan and New Zealand have successfully implemented strategies without prolonged lockdowns, focusing instead on border control and community compliance.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Covid-19 transmission dynamics
  • Knowledge of public health measures and their effectiveness
  • Familiarity with vaccine development and distribution challenges
  • Awareness of global responses to pandemics, particularly in different countries
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the impact of lockdowns on Covid-19 transmission rates in various countries
  • Study the efficacy of different Covid-19 vaccines and their impact on community immunity
  • Examine successful public health strategies employed by Taiwan and New Zealand
  • Explore the role of public compliance in health measures during pandemics
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for public health officials, epidemiologists, policymakers, and anyone interested in understanding the complexities of managing pandemics and the effectiveness of lockdowns as a public health strategy.

  • #31
When they say that a vaccine is "90% effective" what is that relative to? If you had a disease that only 50% of the population were vulnerable to, and everyone got the vaccine, would that make 90% of the people immune? Or 95% of the people immune?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
  • #32
Algr said:
When they say that a vaccine is "90% effective" what is that relative to? If you had a disease that only 50% of the population were vulnerable to, and everyone got the vaccine, would that make 90% of the people immune? Or 95% of the people immune?
It would appear that they don't overthink such things.

https://www.pfizer.com/news/press-r...ntech-conclude-phase-3-study-covid-19-vaccine
43000 participants​
170 total cases​
162 cases in the placebo group​
8 cases in the vaccine group​

(162 - 8) / 162 * 100% = 95.1%

https://www.nih.gov/news-events/new...s-clinical-trial-nih-moderna-covid-19-vaccine
>30000 participants​
95 total cases​
90 cases in the placebo group​
5 cases in the vaccine group​
(90 - 5) / 90 * 100% = 94.4%
https://www.cdc.gov/csels/dsepd/ss1978/lesson3/section6.html
Vaccine efficacy or vaccine effectiveness​
 
Last edited:
  • #33
Okay, thanks.

I was thinking of the notorious "lie detector" theoretical where a "90% accurate" lie detector ends up producing more false positives then actual positives. But I'm not sure if that applies here or not.
 
  • #34
Algr said:
Okay, thanks.

I was thinking of the notorious "lie detector" theoretical where a "90% accurate" lie detector ends up producing more false positives then actual positives. But I'm not sure if that applies here or not.
Ha! Please note that I've changed my post, as, while looking at the equation, although the answer came out fairly correct, it didn't strike me as making much sense.
dumb.luck.maths.2020-11-19 at 12.14.31 PM.png
 

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K