Would complexity re-emerge if cosmic expansion reversed?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the hypothetical scenario of the universe's expansion reversing and collapsing back to a pre-inflation state. Participants explore whether this reversal could lead to the re-emergence of complexity, such as particles, stars, galaxies, and potentially life, or if the universe would remain featureless until a singularity develops. The conversation touches on theoretical implications and the necessity of mechanisms behind such changes.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that if the universe were to collapse, it might lead to the formation of complex structures again, while others question the feasibility of such a scenario without a defined mechanism.
  • One participant expresses difficulty accepting the notion of "slow" expansion, citing the recession rate of distant objects and the acceleration of that recession as significant factors.
  • There is a suggestion that the curvature of spacetime could change, potentially allowing for a reversal of acceleration, but this is met with skepticism regarding the lack of a theoretical basis for such a change.
  • Another participant emphasizes that assumptions about reversing cosmic expansion must consider the underlying physics, particularly the role of dark energy and stress-energy in the universe.
  • Concerns are raised about the lack of a well-defined model to discuss the implications of reversing expansion, with a call for references that might support such a scenario.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally disagree on the feasibility of reversing cosmic expansion and the implications of such a reversal. There is no consensus on whether complexity would re-emerge or if the scenario is even plausible given current understanding of physics.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on assumptions about cosmic mechanics, the undefined nature of the proposed reversal, and the current dominance of dark energy in the universe, which complicates discussions about potential outcomes.

Swamp Thing
Insights Author
Messages
1,047
Reaction score
798
Imagine that for some reason the current slow expansion of the universe is going to reverse, and the universe is going to collapse back to the pre-inflation state. [Let's make this an assumption without worrying about the mechnism]

So we have a very dilute and cold distribution of energy, since everything has been processed by black holes in the crunch-and-evaporate process. As this universe begins concentrate down again, would we see particles, stars and galaxies forming, and life evolving, and so on? Or would it remain featureless until maybe a "deflation" and a singularity develops?
 
Space news on Phys.org
Swamp Thing said:
Imagine that for some reason the current slow expansion of the universe ...
I have a hard time getting past that sentence. If you consider nothing more than our Observable Universe, the recession rate of the most distant objects is about three times the speed of light. I REALLY can't accept that that is "slow". Also, the recession is accelerating, which also makes it hard to think of it as slow.

[Let's make this an assumption without worrying about the mechnism
I don't think you CAN ignore the mechanism since even assuming your assumption is possible, the answer to your question might well depend on the mechanism.
 
My bad.

Would it be okay to say, "assuming that the current acceleration is going to reverse at some stage" ?

Edit: I'm no expert, but I gather that this has to do with the curvature of our spacetime. If the curvature could change, presumably the acceleration would reverse ... ??
 
Swamp Thing said:
My bad.

Would it be okay to say, "assuming that the current acceleration is going to reverse at some stage" ?
Sure. There's no reason to believe that it IS, but you can posit that if you like. You STILL need a mechanism in order for your question to be meaningful. Right now, your question amounts to asking "if the laws of physics are not at all as we understand them to be then what do those laws say about <insert ANYTHING>". This is not a meaningful question really since it contains its own self destruction.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Imager
That makes sense. I think you're saying indirectly that no known physics can reverse the overall curvature of any universe.

Thanks.
 
Swamp Thing said:
Imagine that for some reason the current slow expansion of the universe is going to reverse, and the universe is going to collapse back to the pre-inflation state. [Let's make this an assumption without worrying about the mechnism]

Sorry, you can't just make assumptions and not worry about the mechanism, because if we don't have a theory that allows the scenario you assume as a solution, which I don't think we do (see below), we have no way of saying what will happen in your scenario.

Swamp Thing said:
we have a very dilute and cold distribution of energy, since everything has been processed by black holes in the crunch-and-evaporate process.

Since this certainly isn't the case now, I assume you're talking about some time very, very, very far in the future (something like ##10^70## years or more). How would the expansion of the universe reverse at that point?

Swamp Thing said:
Would it be okay to say, "assuming that the current acceleration is going to reverse at some stage" ?

No. Reversing the expansion is not the same as reversing the acceleration. The latter is a much less stringent condition than the former.

Swamp Thing said:
I'm no expert, but I gather that this has to do with the curvature of our spacetime.

No, it has to do with what kinds of stress-energy are present. Currently the universe is dominated by dark energy, and we expect that to remain the case forever into the future, in which case the expansion will continue to accelerate forever.

For your scenario to work, you would have to find a way to (a) get rid of the dark energy so the expansion can decelerate, and (b) somehow increase the overall density of stress-energy in the universe enough to be above the critical density, so the universe will stop expanding and start recollapsing. I don't know of any way to do either of those things within our current understanding of physics. If you can find a reference that seems to suggest a way, post it. But in the absence of one I don't think we have a well-defined model to discuss.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
8K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
8K