The discussion revolves around a hypothetical scenario in general relativity (GR) concerning the immediate effects on Earth if the Sun were to disappear suddenly. Participants explore the implications of such an event on Earth's orbit, considering both the theoretical constraints of GR and the propagation of gravitational effects.
Participants generally disagree on the interpretation of the hypothetical scenario and its implications within GR. While some acknowledge the eight-minute delay in gravitational effects, others maintain that the question itself is invalid under GR, leading to unresolved tensions in the discussion.
Participants note that the scenario of the Sun disappearing is mathematically inconsistent with GR, which complicates the discussion. The conversation also touches on the need for clarity regarding the definitions of mass changes and gravitational effects.
Regardless of level, do you want to learn something or just be told a story? This is the difference between science and popular science. Whereas learning science will tell you how the theories actually work and generally requires you to make more effort outside your comfort zone, popular science will tell you a story about science that comes with a million caveats you have no chance to catch as a layman. This is all good if you understand that and it is what you want. However, there are countless examples of people coming to these forums with the impression that they know science based on popularised accounts.Julius Ceasar said:It all good Oro i am now aware the question is impossible in GR and will work on it. It was a high school level question so perhaps tone it down sunshine.