Would one be pushing as much as their weight?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the mechanics of pushing weight in relation to a chest press machine and a chair lift. It highlights that while the work done may be equivalent, the effective weight being pressed can differ based on the distance ratio between the two movements. A mechanical advantage allows for a lower force over a longer distance, maintaining the equality of input and output work. The conversation emphasizes understanding how these principles apply to exercise equipment. Overall, the relationship between distance and weight is crucial in determining the effectiveness of the workout.
biomajor
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
In the following video, there is a machine. https://youtu.be/a_CGlAnxO5c It looks like a chest press machine but doesn't have weights attached - only attached to the chair. Would one be lifting as much as they weigh?
Relevant Equations
I was thinking it might have something to do with W = F•d
Because one is effectively pushing in the same way as a chest press machine, wouldn't the work done be the same?

1700758031609.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF.

Yes, it does look like how you describe it. The only caveat would be the ratio between the chest press distance and the chair lift distance. I couldn't tell if it was 1:1 or maybe more like 2:1. The work will still be the same, but you would only be pressing half of your weight in the latter case.
 
berkeman said:
Welcome to PF.

Yes, it does look like how you describe it. The only caveat would be the ratio between the chest press distance and the chair lift distance. I couldn't tell if it was 1:1 or maybe more like 2:1. The work will still be the same, but you would only be pressing half of your weight in the latter case.

Hello! Thank you for the warm welcome!
If it is not too much trouble, may I ask how the ratio would change the weight but not the work? I imagined it as a pulley system so the weight would be the same but the work done would change because of differing distances? Is this an incorrect way to look at it?
 
Thread 'Chain falling out of a horizontal tube onto a table'
My attempt: Initial total M.E = PE of hanging part + PE of part of chain in the tube. I've considered the table as to be at zero of PE. PE of hanging part = ##\frac{1}{2} \frac{m}{l}gh^{2}##. PE of part in the tube = ##\frac{m}{l}(l - h)gh##. Final ME = ##\frac{1}{2}\frac{m}{l}gh^{2}## + ##\frac{1}{2}\frac{m}{l}hv^{2}##. Since Initial ME = Final ME. Therefore, ##\frac{1}{2}\frac{m}{l}hv^{2}## = ##\frac{m}{l}(l-h)gh##. Solving this gives: ## v = \sqrt{2g(l-h)}##. But the answer in the book...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
770
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
830
Replies
3
Views
956
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K