Would one be pushing as much as their weight?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the mechanics of pushing weight in relation to a chest press machine and a chair lift. It highlights that while the work done may be equivalent, the effective weight being pressed can differ based on the distance ratio between the two movements. A mechanical advantage allows for a lower force over a longer distance, maintaining the equality of input and output work. The conversation emphasizes understanding how these principles apply to exercise equipment. Overall, the relationship between distance and weight is crucial in determining the effectiveness of the workout.
biomajor
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
In the following video, there is a machine. https://youtu.be/a_CGlAnxO5c It looks like a chest press machine but doesn't have weights attached - only attached to the chair. Would one be lifting as much as they weigh?
Relevant Equations
I was thinking it might have something to do with W = F•d
Because one is effectively pushing in the same way as a chest press machine, wouldn't the work done be the same?

1700758031609.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF.

Yes, it does look like how you describe it. The only caveat would be the ratio between the chest press distance and the chair lift distance. I couldn't tell if it was 1:1 or maybe more like 2:1. The work will still be the same, but you would only be pressing half of your weight in the latter case.
 
berkeman said:
Welcome to PF.

Yes, it does look like how you describe it. The only caveat would be the ratio between the chest press distance and the chair lift distance. I couldn't tell if it was 1:1 or maybe more like 2:1. The work will still be the same, but you would only be pressing half of your weight in the latter case.

Hello! Thank you for the warm welcome!
If it is not too much trouble, may I ask how the ratio would change the weight but not the work? I imagined it as a pulley system so the weight would be the same but the work done would change because of differing distances? Is this an incorrect way to look at it?
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top