Would sodium salicytate dissolve in any of them

  • Thread starter Thread starter Alexestalex
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dissolve Sodium
AI Thread Summary
Sodium salicylate is a polar compound due to its hydroxyl group, which influences its solubility in various solvents. It is expected to dissolve well in water because of its polar nature, although the presence of carbon-oxygen bonds provides only slight polarity. Diethyl ether, being non-polar, may not dissolve sodium salicylate effectively, despite some claims of compatibility. The discussion also suggests that sodium salicylate could interact with hydrochloric acid due to its electron-rich oxygen, potentially facilitating dissolution. Overall, the solubility of sodium salicylate varies significantly across the mentioned solvents.
Alexestalex
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Would sodium salicytate dissolve in any of the following solvents?

Water
Diethyl Ether
6% HCL
6% sodium bicarbonate
6% Sodium Hydroxide (naoh)

You don't have to but please explain your guess too. Thanks a lot.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



I think it would dissolve in water due to the three Carbon Oxygen bonds it has (giving it a tad bit of polarity) but ever so slightly. The big cyclohexane is non polar which is why it wouldn't dissolve well.

I think it would dissolve well in diethyl ether, they are both extremely non polar. Diethyl ether is non polar due to its symmetry.

I think it would dissolve in HCL. HCL is electron poor while the O in sodium salicytate is electron rich. The electron rich O would grab the H and give the pair of electrons to CL.

The rest makes no sense to me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is - chemically - sodium salicylate?

(I assume you mean salicylate, I have no idea what salicytate is).
 
Yes, that's what i meant.
 
So what it is?
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top