Would you see stars on the early Earth?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter windy miller
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Earth Stars
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the visibility of stars from the surface of the early Earth during its formation, considering factors such as atmospheric conditions, volcanic outgassing, and the proximity of the Moon. Participants explore various hypotheses regarding the clarity of the night sky and the impact of clouds and atmospheric density on visibility.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that after cooling, the early Earth had no atmosphere, leading to a starry sky similar to that of the Moon, where stars would not twinkle.
  • Others argue that significant outgassing occurred during Earth's formation, potentially resulting in a denser atmosphere than the current one.
  • A participant questions whether a thick atmosphere could block out all stars, including the Sun, and whether this view aligns with conventional understanding.
  • One participant mentions the impact of a comet barrage and the presence of a close Moon, suggesting that these factors could obscure the visibility of stars.
  • Concerns are raised about the potential for a thick cloud layer due to water vapor and other gases, drawing parallels to Venus's current atmosphere.
  • Another participant posits that a very close Moon could provide ambient light, but stars would remain invisible as distinct objects.
  • There is a discussion about the discernibility of the Moon's shape through cloud cover, emphasizing its brightness due to proximity during the early Earth period.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the density of the early atmosphere and its effects on star visibility, indicating that multiple competing perspectives remain without a clear consensus.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference varying assumptions about atmospheric conditions, the effects of volcanic activity, and the influence of celestial bodies, which remain unresolved in the discussion.

windy miller
Messages
306
Reaction score
28
Im wondering what the night sky would look like if you stood on the surface of the Earth as it was forming?
Here is my best guess, I would like to know if I am on the right track
1. After it cooled down, it had no atmosphere so it would be like the surface of the moon so the stars wouldn't twinkle.
2 outgassing from volcanoes gradually started to make an atmosphere but then things start to get complicated . it seems there isn't agreement on how think the atmosphere was initially , see article below:
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/early-earth-s-atmosphere-was-surprisingly-thin/
Im wondering if you could still see the stars at night even with the thicker atmosphere model or not?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
windy miller said:
Im wondering what the night sky would look like if you stood on the surface of the Earth as it was forming?
Here is my best guess, I would like to know if I am on the right track
1. After it cooled down, it had no atmosphere so it would be like the surface of the moon so the stars wouldn't twinkle.

I think there was plenty of outgassing as Earth was forming, and atmosphere was already rather significant. Possibly denser than our current one.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn
nikkkom said:
I think there was plenty of outgassing as Earth was forming, and atmosphere was already rather significant. Possibly denser than our current one.

Thanks for your answer. Would it be so dense to block out all the stars, maybe even the sun itself? Given the article I linked should we think it wasn't so dense or is this seen as not the conventional view?
 
Has the Earth was forming there was an extensive comet barrage in progress. The zodiacal light would have been intense. Lots of lights to decease view of stars. If the moon was still forming the ring of dust would block a lot. Also moon was much closer so a full moon would drown out more stars the it does now.

With oceans steaming off it would have bee cloudy a lot.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: windy miller
thanks that's very interesting. What about the Sun , even with the cloud do you thin it would block out the sun?
 
While Earth's surface was still hot, any water present would only be able to exist as water vapor in the atmosphere.
There could have been enough to to produce a thick permanent cloud layer with other gases and particulates mixed in.
Similar to how Venus is at present.
 
What about the proximity of the moon? I am thinking it was v close to Earth in its early history so maybe even if there was a thick cloud layer it would have been bright enough to see due this proximity? Do you think this is right?
 
On Venus sunlight does reach the surface as a diffused ambient light.
For a cloud covered Earth, a very close Moon (as well as the Sun) could produce ambient light.at the surface.
Other stars and bodies however would not be visible at all.
You could determine that there is a light source or two, but would not be able to see them as objects in the ordinary sense of seeing
 
Last edited:
Yes I wasn't really thinking about an ambient light source, but a discernable shape. I know that at full moon with some cloud cover i can see the shape fo the moon through the clouds. So the ability to discern the shape of the moon will depend not just on the cloud cover but also the brightness of the moon. On the Early Earth the moon would have been amazingly bright as it was so close. So perhaps it could have had a discernable shape.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K