MHB Write an inequality that describes the region where the grass has been planted

  • Thread starter Thread starter Yazan975
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inequality
Yazan975
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
View attachment 8955

I do not know how to start thinking about part a and then got even more confused when I saw the answer be:
P<x^2-5x.

I ask for your guidance please.
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2019-05-05 at 10.26.36 AM.png
    Screen Shot 2019-05-05 at 10.26.36 AM.png
    31.6 KB · Views: 101
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The problem is rather misleading since the perimeter upper edge follows the path of the parabolic curve $P = 5x-x^2$ for values $0 \le x \le 5$. The sketch shown looks more like a semicircle (why, I don't know). See the attached graph for a better depiction.

Since grass is planted below the edge defined by that parabola, then the planted region, $R$, is located under the curve that defines the upper edge and above the x-axis ... that is $0 \le R \le P = 5x-x^2$. So I do not agree with the inequality you stated, $P < x^2-5x$.

Are you able to answer the remaining questions?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top