MHB Yes, the correct solution would be to subtract (x/2) from both sides, not 2x.

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathdad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Quadratic
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on solving the quadratic inequality 2/x < x/2. The correct approach involves subtracting x/2 from both sides rather than multiplying, leading to the expression (4 - x^2)/(2x) < 0. This reveals critical values at -2, 0, and 2, resulting in four intervals for testing. The valid solution intervals are found to be (-2, 0) and (2, infinity), while the endpoints -2 and 2 are excluded from the solution. The conclusion emphasizes the importance of the correct algebraic manipulation in solving the inequality.
mathdad
Messages
1,280
Reaction score
0
Solve the quadratic inequality.

2/x < x/2

Multiply both sides by 2x.

(2x)*(2/x) < (2x)(x/2)

4 < x^2

4 = x^2

sqrt{4} = sqrt{x^2}

-2 = x

2 = x

Our end points are -2 and 2.

<------(-2)----------(2)------->

For (-infinity, -2), let x = -3. In this interval, we get true.

For (-2, 2), let x = 0. In this interval, we get false.

For (2, infinity), let x = 3. In this interval, we get true.

Test the end points.

Let x = -2 and x = 2.

At x = -2, we get false.

At x = 2, we get false.

We exclude the test points.

Solution: (-infinity, -2) U (2, infinity)

Correct?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
RTCNTC said:
Solve the quadratic inequality.

2/x < x/2

Multiply both sides by 2x.

You are assuming x is positive when you do that. A better step is to subtract x/2 from both sides:

$$\frac{2}{x}-\frac{x}{2}<0$$

Combine terms:

$$\frac{4-x^2}{2x}<0$$

$$\frac{(2+x)(2-x)}{2x}<0$$

Now we see we have 3 critical values which give us 4 intervals:

$$(-\infty,-2)$$ Test value: x = -3: expression is (-)(+)/(-) = + not part of solution. Other intervals will alternate...

$$(-2,0)$$ is part of solution.

$$(0,2)$$ not part of solution.

$$(2,\infty)$$ is part of solution.

And so the solution is:

$$(-2,0)\,\cup\,(2,\infty)$$
 
You meant to say subtract (x/2) from both sides not 2x.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...

Similar threads

Back
Top