Your dog likes it when you smile at it

  • Thread starter Thread starter BillTre
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the reliability of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) in studying brain activity, particularly in non-human subjects. Participants highlight a controversial study where a dead salmon was scanned, revealing false positives in brain activity when shown human faces. The conversation underscores the limitations of fMRI as an indirect measure of brain function, questioning the correlation between observed blood flow and actual neuronal activity. Additionally, the emotional responses of pets, such as dogs, to human expressions are contrasted with the absurdity of the salmon study.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI)
  • Knowledge of brain activity measurement techniques
  • Familiarity with the concept of false positives in scientific research
  • Basic awareness of animal behavior and emotional responses
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the limitations and criticisms of fMRI in neuroscience studies
  • Explore alternative brain imaging techniques, such as PET scans
  • Investigate the behavioral responses of pets to human emotions
  • Study the physiological effects of death on brain cells and their activity
USEFUL FOR

Neuroscientists, animal behaviorists, pet owners, and anyone interested in the implications of brain imaging techniques in understanding emotional responses in animals.

BillTre
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
2,739
Reaction score
11,966
Short Science mag news story here.
Brain scans similar to humans.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: member 587159 and Evo
Biology news on Phys.org
It should be noted that functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), the technique that the study is based on, have been notoriously unreliable and subject to many false positive. For example, to demonstrate the ease of discovering false positives, researches placed a dead salmon from the supermarket into an fMRI scanner and, using the same analysis techniques used in many published papers, found signs of activity in certain regions of the brain when showing the salmon pictures of human faces. Furthermore, fMRI is a very indirect measure of brain activity, measuring things like increased blood flow or increased metabolic activity in different areas of the brain. To what extent these observables correlate with the underlying activity of neurons is still unclear.

Here's a nice piece from a few years ago highlighting some of the issues with fMRI and other similar brain scans:
http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/guest-blog/controversial-science-of-brain-imaging/
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Fervent Freyja, Drakkith, jim mcnamara and 2 others
Ygggdrasil said:
researches placed a dead salmon from the supermarket into an fMRI scanner and, using the same analysis techniques used in many published papers, found signs of activity in certain regions of the brain when showing the salmon pictures of human faces.
:doh:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Dr.D and Drakkith
Ygggdrasil said:
researches placed a dead salmon from the supermarket into an fMRI scanner and, using the same analysis techniques used in many published papers, found signs of activity in certain regions of the brain when showing the salmon pictures of human faces.
Wait, I may need to amend my previous post. Exactly what human faces were shown to the dead salmon?

https://image1.masterfile.com/getIm...ng-a-large-king-salmon-caught-on-a-salmon.jpg
854-02955512em-commercial-fisherman-holding-a-large-king-salmon-caught-on-a-salmon.jpg
 

Attachments

  • 854-02955512em-commercial-fisherman-holding-a-large-king-salmon-caught-on-a-salmon.jpg
    854-02955512em-commercial-fisherman-holding-a-large-king-salmon-caught-on-a-salmon.jpg
    27.5 KB · Views: 1,252
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Evo
BillTre said:
Short Science mag news story here.
Brain scans similar to humans.
With or without teeth? :)
 
Greg Bernhardt said:
With or without teeth? :)
It took me WAY too long to decode what you were asking. o0)

:smile:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Greg Bernhardt
Ygggdrasil said:
It should be noted that functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), the technique that the study is based on, have been notoriously unreliable and subject to many false positive. For example, to demonstrate the ease of discovering false positives, researches placed a dead salmon from the supermarket into an fMRI scanner and, using the same analysis techniques used in many published papers, found signs of activity in certain regions of the brain when showing the salmon pictures of human faces. Furthermore, fMRI is a very indirect measure of brain activity, measuring things like increased blood flow or increased metabolic activity in different areas of the brain. To what extent these observables correlate with the underlying activity of neurons is still unclear.

Here's a nice piece from a few years ago highlighting some of the issues with fMRI and other similar brain scans:
http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/guest-blog/controversial-science-of-brain-imaging/
Now that hurts Yggg! I know my recently deceased dog, Ming, would respond to me smiling by waging his tail. Maybe dead salmon have superpowers we just don't know about yet. Ok, I will temp ban myself now. :frown:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Wes Tausend
Evo said:
Now that hurts Yggg! I know my recently deceased dog, Ming, would respond to me smiling by waging his tail. Maybe dead salmon have superpowers we just don't know about yet. Ok, I will temp ban myself now. :frown:
Hmmm... Not so sure EVO... :DD
Just as digestion may successfully continue for a bit after death, so might photoelectric-like retina cells. The resulting electrical signals might then fire a few surviving neurons just like the semi-living nerve tissue in frog legs, which can cause them to jump when electrically stimulated. :wideeyed:

And then... domestically bred salmon might still respond to human faces just like my wife's tropical fish that frantically rush to the front top tank-side when she approaches to possibly feed them. Or like her fuzzy poodle (Quincy), who always equates a smile with food and automatically wiggles his tail like the fish. Any facial expression actually. Ok, now I'm banned too. At home and PF. :oops:

Wes
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Evo
  • #10
Neurons, being high metabolism cells, will be among the first to die after organismal death. I am guessing within minutes.
Skin, hair, connective tissue, and cornea cells can all last several hours after death.
Cornea cells can be removed up to 24 hours after death and still be useful for transplants.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Wes Tausend and berkeman
  • #11
BillTre, thanks for making more explicitly clear, the lack of life-after-death of most cells, especially neurons. I should have emphasized that I was joking. :smile:

Although I still view with wonderment that some simple brain-cells, like those of a frog, seem to withstand freezing temps while they hibernate at near death. And how do chickens keep their balance running when their head is missing? Of course all frog brain-cells have to do, when they thaw, is remember that flies taste good. And obviously the chicken head is only for remembering... that flies taste good. And what is it that flies remember when they warm back up the next season? Ick. ?:)

Finally, on a more serious note, I should have added to my previous post, that my condolences go out to Evo and all whom have loved and lost a pet. They become almost like our children. They should live longer than us. Been there, done that. :frown:

Wes
...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BillTre

Similar threads

  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K