confusedashell
- 125
- 0
Just thought it'd be fun to see which people are regarded as the most intelligent and most important contributers to quantum physics?
The discussion revolves around participants sharing their favorite quantum physicists and the reasons behind their choices. It touches on various aspects of quantum physics, including contributions to theory, interpretation, and notable achievements of different physicists.
Participants generally express a range of opinions on their favorite physicists, with no clear consensus on who is the most important or intelligent contributor to quantum physics. Multiple competing views remain throughout the discussion.
Some participants reference specific contributions and achievements of physicists, but there is no resolution on the significance of these contributions or the criteria for determining importance.
confusedashell said:Just thought it'd be fun to see which people are regarded as the most intelligent and most important contributers to quantum physics?
jimmysnyder said:I'll go with pam, I'll go with P.A.M. Dirac. He has an equation. Do you?
lisab said:An equation and a notation, no less.
The ? is most appropriate.what said:Witten?
and a femtometer.Gokul43201 said:Fermi. He has an accelerator, a paradox, a problem, a hole, a heap, a statistical distribution, a particle, a Golden Rule, an energy level and a Linux distribution named after him.
Gokul43201 said:Fermi. He has an accelerator, a paradox, a problem, a hole, a heap, a statistical distribution, a particle, a Golden Rule, an energy level and a Linux distribution named after him.
Yes, but, "Fermi function" is almost a household term nowadays! :)robphy said:What statistical distribution? Fermi-Dirac?
Yeah, but the sea is filled with Fermions, as is the sky above the Dirac sea!Dirac has a video codec named after him, as well as a sea.
I believe that's right.(The linux distribution is tied to the accelerator, right?)
This is probably the second person at least mentionning this fact in this same discussion. No time to read even 19 other messages ?Cyrus said:This is probably the 10th thread asking the same damn question...it gets old.
humanino said:This is probably the second person at least mentionning this fact in this same discussion. No time to read even 19 other messages ?
At least for once we agree.Cyrus said:I just find it annoying that these threads keep on popping up, over, and over, and over.......and over.
Schrödinger's Dog said:Toss up between Planck, Dirac, Einstein (well sort of) Smolin, Born, Kaku and Feynman. With honourable mentions to Pauli, Heisenberg and Schrödinger of course and in no particular order I can think of.
I wish I could find that photo of the great meeting of minds on QM, because frankly my favourites are all there, but I can't remember all the players off the top of my head.
robphy said:This one?
http://photos.aip.org/veritySearch2.jsp?item_id=Einstein%20Albert%20E3&fname=einstein_Albert_e3.jpg&title=null&storePublished=Y&color=N&contactID=78
Why Kaku?Schrödinger's Dog said:Toss up between Planck, Dirac, Einstein (well sort of) Smolin, Born, Kaku and Feynman. With honourable mentions to Pauli, Heisenberg and Schrödinger of course and in no particular order I can think of.