Your worried about confounders. how a future study could be carried

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter sosme
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Future Study
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on strategies to minimize confounders in studies involving epidural administration during labor. The consensus is that randomization is the most effective method to control for confounding variables, specifically through options such as randomizing mothers to receive either early or late epidurals. Additionally, matching mothers based on age can enhance the validity of the results. The importance of verifying that randomization effectively distributes potential confounders is emphasized, particularly in obstetrical outcomes.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of randomization techniques in clinical trials
  • Familiarity with confounding variables in epidemiological studies
  • Knowledge of Hill's Causal Criteria for establishing causality
  • Basic principles of obstetrical outcomes related to epidural use
NEXT STEPS
  • Research "Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) in obstetrics" for practical applications
  • Study "Matching techniques in epidemiological research" to reduce confounding
  • Explore "Hill's Causal Criteria" for evaluating causal relationships
  • Investigate "Statistical methods for checking randomization effectiveness" in clinical studies
USEFUL FOR

Researchers in obstetrics, epidemiologists, and healthcare professionals involved in clinical trial design and analysis, particularly those focused on minimizing confounding factors in treatment studies.

sosme
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Your worried about confounders. how a future study could be carried out in which one would not have to worry about confounders. What options would you choose (ignore ethical and feasibility issues for this study - focus on theoretical) (Check all that apply)

1 We will take sisters and give one sister a late epidural, and one sister an early epidural
2 We will randomly choose mothers from a list of those that had late epidurals, and those that did not have late epidurals
3 You could randomize mothers to receive either early epidural, or late epidural
4 None of the above
5 We will match mothers with and without late epidurals based on age
6 We will take the next 100 mothers that come into the labour and delivery wardMy Attempt

I know that I would us Hill's Causal Criteria but I am stuck bwteen 1 and 3 since I think RTCs don't have confounds?. Which ones would be the way to go with reducing confounders

thank you
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


sosme said:
1 We will take sisters and give one sister a late epidural, and one sister an early epidural
2 We will randomly choose mothers from a list of those that had late epidurals, and those that did not have late epidurals
3 You could randomize mothers to receive either early epidural, or late epidural
4 None of the above
5 We will match mothers with and without late epidurals based on age
6 We will take the next 100 mothers that come into the labour and delivery ward
thank you
Whenever you can practically and ethically randomize treatments, you should do it. You didn't specify the outcome measure, but as long as the treatment, or the lack of it, doesn't pose a danger to the subjects, randomization is the best choice.

Note while randomization is the best way to control for confounding factors, but it's not certain. You always need to check that the randomization worked so that potential confounders are evenly distributed within acceptable limits. You can also match by age within a randomization scheme and it would be a good idea to do so in this particular study assuming you are talking about obstetrical outcomes.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K