Zero energy universe means nothing exists at all times

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of a zero energy universe, specifically examining the implications of positive and negative energy counterparts and their relation to existence. Participants explore theoretical implications, potential contradictions, and the nature of energy in the context of matter and gravity.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether the existence of positive energy always having a negative counterpart implies that nothing exists.
  • Another participant argues that in a zero energy universe, the positive energy of matter is balanced by the negative energy of gravity, suggesting that this does not mean that matter or gravity does not exist.
  • It is proposed that the zero energy universe concept may be an accounting trick rather than a fundamental truth, with a preference for this view over the necessity of antimatter to balance energy.
  • A participant clarifies that antimatter possesses positive energy, similar to ordinary matter, challenging the notion that it serves as a negative energy counterpart.
  • A repeated question about the implications of positive and negative energy on existence is raised, drawing a parallel to electric charge neutrality in protons and electrons.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of the zero energy universe concept, with no consensus reached regarding the existence of matter and gravity in this framework. The discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes speculative elements and personal theories that have been moderated, indicating a divergence from mainstream scientific perspectives.

George bailey
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
If any positive energy always has a negative energy counterpart, then nothing ever exists. Am I missing something here?
 
Space news on Phys.org
In the zero energy scenario, the positive energy of matter is offset by the negative energy of gravity. It would not be logical to infer that neither matter or gravity exists on this basis. It has been suggested the zero energy universe concept is little more than an accounting trick to balance the energy budget of the universe. It makes more sense than positing the universe must include an equal mass of antimatter to balance the books. We have abundant evidence for gravity and zero evidence for large quantities of antimatter in the universe.
 
But antimatter does not have negative energy. It has positive energy just like ordinary matter.
 
George bailey said:
If any positive energy always has a negative energy counterpart, then nothing ever exists. Am I missing something here?
Protons have positive electric charge, while electrons have negative electric charge. The total charge is always zero. Does this mean that neither protons nor electrons exist?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: bapowell
Closed pending moderation
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

Undergrad Questions on the consequence of an evolving dark energy parameter
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Undergrad Creation of our universe from zero energy?
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
High School Why doesn't cosmic inflation violate conservation of energy?
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
High School Roger Penrose model of the rebirthing universe
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
Undergrad Dark Matter , Dark energy and the Dirac equation
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Undergrad What Are the Origins of the Universe?
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
High School Big Bang and Infinite Universe
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
Undergrad Conservation of energy in cosmology
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Undergrad Dark energy and the kinematic Sunyaev-Zeldovich effect?
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
High School How much energy does our Universe have?
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K