Zero from which the energy is measured

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ShayanJ
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Zero
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of zero-point energy in quantum mechanics, particularly in the context of the harmonic oscillator. Participants explore the implications of choosing different origins for potential energy and the significance of absolute energy levels in quantum systems.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that by choosing a different origin for the potential in the harmonic oscillator, the ground state energy appears to be zero, raising questions about the nature of zero-point energy.
  • Another participant argues that absolute energy has no meaning in nonrelativistic quantum mechanics, emphasizing that only energy differences are significant.
  • A different viewpoint states that a constant term in the Hamiltonian does not affect the equations of motion, indicating that it does not influence the spectral equation for stationary states.
  • Concerns are raised about the implications of declaring zero-point energy as meaningless, questioning the validity of statements found in introductory quantum mechanics textbooks regarding the differences between classical and quantum mechanics.
  • One participant asserts that the term \(\hbar \omega / 2\) is essential in quantum theory, attributing it to the non-commuting nature of position and momentum operators.
  • Another participant emphasizes that the residual energy is specific to the harmonic oscillator and questions why it is not evident in the modified potential discussed.
  • Some participants clarify that the constant added to the potential can be absorbed into a time-dependent phase factor, and that the zero-point energy is a characteristic of the squared coordinate potential.
  • There is a contention regarding whether the concept of zero-point energy is unique to the harmonic oscillator or applicable to all quantum systems due to the uncertainty principle.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views regarding the significance and interpretation of zero-point energy, with no consensus reached on its meaning or implications in the context of the harmonic oscillator and quantum mechanics in general.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the discussion involves assumptions about the nature of energy in quantum mechanics, the role of potential energy origins, and the implications of the uncertainty principle, which remain unresolved.

ShayanJ
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
2,802
Reaction score
605
Consider the famous harmonic oscillator. Now imagine I use my freedom in choosing the origin for the potential and choose, instead of the usual thing, V(x)=\frac{1}{2}m \omega^2 x^2-\frac{1}{2} \hbar \omega, so the TISE becomes:
<br /> -\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{d^2 \psi}{dx^2}+\frac 1 2 m\omega^2x^2 \psi=(E+\frac{1}{2} \hbar \omega) \psi<br />
So its obvious, that the energy levels become E_n= n\hbar \omega. So now the ground state has zero energy!
But this can't be right. Where is zero-point energy? If it is a physical concept, then it shouldn't depend on our choices. So there should be a way that it shows up here too. But I fail to see that way. Any ideas?
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Shyan said:
So now the ground state has zero energy!
So what?
Absolute energy has no meaning in nonrelativistic quantum mechanics. Only energy differences are meaningful, and they stay the same.
 
It's actually simpler than that. A constant term to the classical Hamiltonian has no influence on the Hamilton's equations (remember, the Hamiltonian is under a differential operator wrt q,p) in the eom. The quantum case is simple. The constant produces a complex (unit modulus) time-dependent exponential, hence brings no involvement to the spectral equation which only considers stationary states.
 
So zero-point energy is meaningless?
But that means its completely meaningless to talk about zero-point energy and say:" This is one difference between classical and quantum mechanics where the system can never have zero energy" which is something you can find in most introductory QM textbooks.
So what's all the stuff in here ? No meaning at all?!
What about the minimum energy required by Uncertainty principle?
 
It's actually not like that at all. The hbaromega/2 is mandatory in the quantum theory, can't get rid of it. It's due to the fact that q and p are non-commuting variables *operators/matrices*, The quantized harmonic oscillator has thus a 'residual' energy of purely quantum nature.
 
dextercioby said:
It's actually not like that at all. The hbaromega/2 is mandatory in the quantum theory, can't get rid of it. It's due to the fact that q and p are non-commuting variables *operators/matrices*, The quantized harmonic oscillator has thus a 'residual' energy of purely quantum nature.
That's exactly my point. Every quantum system should contain that. But where is it in the problem I mentioned(with the potential I chose)?
 
It's in the squared coordinate term of the potential. The constant you put by hand can be <gauged away/absorbed> into a time-dependent phase factor.
About the comment <every quantum system should have that>. Well, not really. This <residue> is particular to the squared coordinate potential energy, hence to the harmonic oscillator (or to any Hamiltonian for which there's canonic transformation to bring it to the p^2 +q^2 form). This particularity is then carried forward to free field QFT.
 
Last edited:
dextercioby said:
It's in the squared coordinate term of the potential. The constant you put by hand can be <gauged away/absorbed> into a time-dependent phase factor.
About the comment <every quantum system should have that>. Well, not really. This <residue> is particular to the squared coordinate potential energy, hence to the harmonic oscillator (or to any Hamiltonian for which there's canonic transformation to bring it to the p^2 +q^2 form). This particularity is then carried forward to free field QFT.
I get it, thanks.
And about that comment. I don't understand why you say this is particular to the squared potential. Uncertainty principles requires it to exist for all quantum systems.
 
Shyan said:
So zero-point energy is meaningless?
But that means its completely meaningless to talk about zero-point energy and say:" This is one difference between classical and quantum mechanics where the system can never have zero energy" which is something you can find in most introductory QM textbooks.
So what's all the stuff in here ? No meaning at all?!
What about the minimum energy required by Uncertainty principle?
The zero-point energy is the difference to the lowest point in the potential (=the classical ground state), and that does not change with your energy shift.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K