Flower Pot Falling Past a Window

  • Thread starter Thread starter quick
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Falling Window
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a flower pot falling past a window. The participants are tasked with determining the height from which the pot was dropped, using kinematic equations and considering the effects of gravity on the pot's motion.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of kinematic equations, particularly questioning the correct use of the final velocity and its derivation. There are attempts to clarify the initial conditions and the dimensions of the variables involved.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing feedback on each other's calculations and reasoning. Some have identified errors in the application of formulas, while others are exploring different interpretations of the problem setup. There is a mix of correct and incorrect assertions regarding the equations used.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the assumption that the flower pot was dropped, not thrown, and are trying to reconcile their calculations with the physical context of the problem. There is also mention of specific distances and velocities that are critical to solving the problem, but their correctness is under scrutiny.

quick
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
As you look out of your dorm window, a flower pot suddenly falls past. The pot is visible for a time t, and the vertical length of your window is L_w. Take down to be the positive direction, so that downward velocities are positive and the acceleration due to gravity is the positive quantity g.

Assume that the flower pot was dropped by someone on the floor above you (rather than thrown downward).

now i need to find the height at which the pot was dropped. I am using the equation V_f^2 = v_i^2 + 2a(x_f - x_i)

i figured out the final velocity to be L_w/t + g*t/2

and the initial velocity is 0 because it is dropped but when i enter that the height is (L_w/t + g*t/2) / 2*g , i get an incorrect answer. then i thought of doing the sqrt(L_w/t + g*t/2) / 2*g and it was still wrong. can someone explain what i am doing wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
quick said:
i figured out the final velocity to be L_w/t + g*t/2
Check this one over.
 
what is wrong with it? there was a part of the problem where it asks to figure out the final velocity the instant it passes the bottom of the window and that was correct.
 
Listen to Doc Al. There is something wrong with the equation you gave. Rework the derivation of the equation and you will see why.
 
Where did the square root come from? Should be squared. Always check your formulas if they are dimensionally correct. Yours are not. Your first one has units of velocity/acceleration, which is Time, not distance. Your second one has units of [itex]\sqrt{v}/a[/itex]. This is certainly not distance either.
 
i see now, i forgot to square the final velocity
thanks all for your help!
 
quick said:
and the initial velocity is 0 because it is dropped but when i enter that the height is (L_w/t + g*t/2) / 2*g , i get an incorrect answer. then i thought of doing the sqrt(L_w/t + g*t/2) / 2*g and it was still wrong. can someone explain what i am doing wrong?
Since I found an error in your expression for the final velocity, I didn't look at this part too carefully. As krab explained, always check the dimensions/units of your answer to see if they make sense.

But leaving aside the fact that you have an incorrect expression for the final velocity, you are plugging the wrong thing into the kinematic equation you gave. You need to input the final velocity squared.


Edit: Your expression for final velocity is correct--my mistake.
 
Last edited:
oops... my bad

quick said:
what is wrong with it? there was a part of the problem where it asks to figure out the final velocity the instant it passes the bottom of the window and that was correct.
Guess what? There was nothing wrong with it. I wasn't paying attention--I thought you were calculating the initial velocity (at the top of the window).

My apologies! :blushing: (Back to sleep for me.)
 
actually i could use your help for one more part of the problem. it is asking for the final velocity as the pot hits the ground. it introduced a new velocity v_b as the velocity at the instant the pot is at the bottom of the window, thus, i am able to use that velocity v_b as the initial velocity and h_b is the distance from the bottom of the window to the ground.
so v_b is just the final velocity from the last problem : L_w/t + g*t/2

so the velocity when the pot hits the ground should be

v_b^2 + 2*g(h_b) but this was wrong so my distance must be incorrect. i tried putting the total distance the pot has fallen, which would be (L_w/t + g*t/2)^2 / ( 2 * g) + h_b and this was incorrect as well. once again i am overlooking something, any help would be appreciated.
 
  • #10
quick said:
actually i could use your help for one more part of the problem. it is asking for the final velocity as the pot hits the ground. it introduced a new velocity v_b as the velocity at the instant the pot is at the bottom of the window, thus, i am able to use that velocity v_b as the initial velocity and h_b is the distance from the bottom of the window to the ground.
so v_b is just the final velocity from the last problem : L_w/t + g*t/2

so the velocity when the pot hits the ground should be

v_b^2 + 2*g(h_b) but this was wrong so my distance must be incorrect. i tried putting the total distance the pot has fallen, which would be (L_w/t + g*t/2)^2 / ( 2 * g) + h_b and this was incorrect as well. once again i am overlooking something, any help would be appreciated.

did you sqrt the v_b^2 + 2*g(h_b)? since vf^2 = vi^2 + 2ad
 
  • #11
quick said:
so the velocity when the pot hits the ground should be

v_b^2 + 2*g(h_b) but this was wrong so my distance must be incorrect.
Since the distance (h_b) was given, we must presume it to be correct. Again, it looks like you forgot that your equation gives the final velocity squared. Take the square root to get the velocity. (As needhelpperson points out.)
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
34
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K