Question regarding Dirac matrices

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter peperone
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dirac Matrices
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the Dirac equation and its relationship to the Klein-Gordon equation, focusing on the manipulation of Dirac matrices and partial derivatives. Participants explore the mathematical properties of these expressions, including questions about commutation and the implications of Lorentz covariance.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether \(\gamma_\nu \gamma^\mu = \gamma^\nu \gamma_\mu\) and whether \(\partial_\nu \partial^\mu = \partial^\nu \partial_\mu\).
  • Another participant emphasizes the importance of considering Lorentz covariance and tensor products of 4-vectors.
  • A participant expresses doubt about the simplicity of the problem and seeks verification of a derived expression involving Dirac matrices and partial derivatives.
  • One participant claims that the expression \(\gamma^\nu\partial_\nu\gamma_\mu\partial^\mu\) can be manipulated to resemble the Klein-Gordon equation, but seeks clarification on the validity of their steps.
  • Another participant suggests that the relationship can be shown using the anticommutation relations of the gamma matrices and manipulation of Lorentz indices.
  • There is a discussion about the correct form of the Klein-Gordon equation, with one participant correcting a typo and expressing satisfaction with their understanding after further clarification.
  • Concerns are raised about the use of identical Lorentz indices in tensor equations, indicating potential confusion in the notation.
  • Participants discuss alternative methods for proving the relationships and the symmetry of partial derivatives as a second rank tensor.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the manipulation of Dirac matrices and the validity of certain mathematical steps. There is no consensus on the best approach to the problem, and multiple perspectives on the relationships involved remain present.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of Lorentz covariance and the potential for confusion with tensor indices. The discussion includes unresolved mathematical steps and assumptions regarding the properties of the gamma matrices and partial derivatives.

peperone
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Hey there.

In an exercise I was trying to show that every solution of the Dirac equation also solves the Klein-Gordon equation.

Now I have two very simple questions:

Is [tex]\gamma_\nu \gamma^\mu = \gamma^\nu \gamma_\mu[/tex] ?

And is [tex]\partial_\nu \partial^\mu = \partial^\nu \partial_\mu[/tex] ?

Thanks for the help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Not really.U should pay attention with this "Lorentz covariance" and always try to see these expressions as tensor products of 4-vectors.

Daniel.
 
I kinda felt it couldn't be that simple. :p

Thanks anyway.
 
Can anybody verify this?

[tex]\gamma^\nu\partial_\nu\gamma_\mu\partial^\mu = \partial_\mu\partial^\mu[/tex]

Just as clarification: I am trying to show that every solution of the Dirac equation also solves the Klein-Gordon equation. So I started with the Dirac equation:

[tex](i\gamma_\mu\partial^\mu - m)\Psi(x) = 0[/tex]

Then, I multiplied it with the operator [tex]-(i\gamma^\nu\partial_\nu + m)[/tex] (from left) which gave me:

[tex](\gamma^\nu\partial_\nu\gamma_\mu\partial^\mu + m^2)\Psi(x) = 0[/tex]

This surely looks somewhat like the Klein-Gordan equation if the above assumption is correct. I just fail to see why it is true.

Any hints appreciated!
 
Last edited:
Yes,it can be shown easily once you manipulate the Lorentz indices and the anticommutation relation between the gamma's.
[tex]\gamma_{\nu}\partial^{\nu}\gamma_{\mu}\partial^{\mu}=\gamma_{\nu}\gamma_{\mu}\partial^{\nu}\partial^{\mu}=\frac{1}{2}\gamma_{(\nu}\gamma_{\mu)}\partial^{\nu}\partial^{\mu}=g_{\mu\nu}\partial^{\nu}\partial^{\mu}=d'alembertian[/tex]

Daniel.

P.S.Did u follow the reasoning...?
 
Why's the KG equation:

[tex](\partial_{\mu}\partial^{\mu}-m^{2})\Psi (\vec{r},t) =0[/tex]

,instead of:

[tex]-(\partial_{\mu}\partial^{\mu}+m^{2})\Psi (\vec{r},t)=0[/tex]

What metric are u using...?

Daniel.
 
dextercioby said:
Why's the KG equation:

[tex](\partial_{\mu}\partial^{\mu}-m^{2})\Psi (\vec{r},t) =0[/tex]

,instead of:

[tex]-(\partial_{\mu}\partial^{\mu}+m^{2})\Psi (\vec{r},t)=0[/tex]

Sorry, it was just a typo. I edited my post. Thanks for all the help. I think I got it now...

Start with the Dirac equation:

[tex](i\gamma_\mu\partial^\mu - m)\Psi(x) = 0[/tex]

Multiply the operator [tex]-(i\gamma_\mu\partial^\mu + m)[/tex] (from left):

[tex](\gamma_\mu\partial^\mu\gamma_\mu\partial^\mu + m^2)\Psi(x) = (\gamma_\mu\gamma_\mu\partial^\mu\partial^\mu + m^2)\Psi(x) = 0[/tex]

Because of the anticommutation relation [tex]\{\gamma^\mu,\gamma^\nu\} = 2 g^{\mu\nu}[/tex] it is possible to simplify [tex]\gamma_\mu\gamma_\mu[/tex] to [tex]g_{\mu\mu}[/tex] which proves [tex]\gamma_\mu\gamma_\mu\partial^\mu\partial^\mu = \partial^\mu\partial_\mu[/tex].

Thanks again.
 
Last edited:
Note that u have 4 identical (Lorentz) indices in the same tensor equation and that's not good,not good at all.
Pay attention with these indices,as u might confuse them.

Daniel.
 
Hm, that's true. Do you know a better way? I'm highly interested in alternative solutions.
 
  • #10
dextercioby said:
Yes,it can be shown easily once you manipulate the Lorentz indices and the anticommutation relation between the gamma's.
[tex]\gamma_{\nu}\partial^{\nu}\gamma_{\mu}\partial^{\mu}=\gamma_{\nu}\gamma_{\mu}\partial^{\nu}\partial^{\mu}=\frac{1}{2}\gamma_{(\nu}\gamma_{\mu)}\partial^{\nu}\partial^{\mu}=g_{\mu\nu}\partial^{\nu}\partial^{\mu}=d'alembertian[/tex]

To be honest, I don't understand what you're doing here (step 2 -> step 3)
 
  • #11
You multiply with the same operator,but with index "nu" (instead of "mu") and then use the trick I've used in post #5.It should come out nicely.


Daniel.
 
  • #12
peperone said:
To be honest, I don't understand what you're doing here (step 2 -> step 3)

[tex]\gamma_{\nu}\gamma_{\mu}T^{\nu\mu}=\frac{1}{2}(\gamma_{\nu}\gamma_{\mu}+\gamma_{\mu}\gamma_{\nu})T^{\mu\nu}[/tex]

where T is a symmetric second rank tensor and to get the second term from the bracket i turned "mu"--->"nu" and "nu"---->"mu" and to factor the same tensor i used the fact that under this renotation,the tensor T is symmetric.

Daniel.
 
  • #13
This surely looks slick! :) But why is [tex]\partial^\nu\partial^\mu[/tex] a symmetric second rank tensor?
 
  • #14
Because wrt bosonic coordinates,the partial derivatives commute.

Daniel.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K