A question about champagne bubbles

  • Thread starter Thread starter Raparicio
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bubbles
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the behavior of champagne bubbles, focusing on their formation, movement, and the physics behind their rising patterns in a glass. Participants explore concepts related to buoyancy, velocity, and pressure dynamics in fluids.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss why bubbles rise in lines and at constant velocity, with some suggesting that surface imperfections on the glass may influence their formation. Questions are raised about the conditions under which bubbles form and the role of pressure in this process.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with various interpretations being explored regarding the behavior of bubbles. Some participants have offered insights into the forces acting on the bubbles, while others are questioning the assumptions about their movement and formation.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of the pressure conditions affecting bubble formation, and some participants express uncertainty about the implications of bubble size and mass in relation to the surrounding liquid.

Raparicio
Messages
115
Reaction score
0
This is an interesting questions that occurs when we have a glass of champagne (or cava).

why all the bubbles that are born in one point, are lineed when they go to surface?

An the other hand: why are they at constant velocity, and not with acceleration?

Chin chin!

R. Aparicio.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Here are my thoughts.

The reason something travels at constant velocity is because the forces acting on it are balanced. In the case of champagne bubbles, the buoyant forces balance the gravitational forces and fluid resistance when the bubbles are rising at a constant speed.

Now then, bubbles are pretty small, light things, so naturally, they float in champagne. However, their smallness also means that they accelerate quickly having been formed (like a truck takes longer to accelerate than a motorbike, for example). So the fact is, for a portion of the bubble's life, it is accelerating; it just happens so quickly you probably don't notice it.

Another element which might have crossed your mind is the hydrostatic pressure gradient between the top and bottom of the glass, causing the bubbles to change size on their journey. In any case, even the tallest champagne flutes probably aren't tall enough for this to make a difference.
 
Champagne

Dear brewnog

I am more or less in the same direction than you. I think that bubbles are one just near the other becouse the upper bubble has a depresion, and goes in the must simple way.

By the other hand, I thing that velocity is really constant, but becouse of the virtual mass or something like this. Bubbles will change in the way to up, but I thing mass of bubbles is not significative in comparation with Champagne (or cava) density.

I will think it a little more. Is only a christmas curiosity.

Best reggards.
 
Sorry Raparicio, I think I misunderstood your original question slightly.


As for the reason the bubbles float up in lines following on from one another, I would like to think that this is due to surface imperfections on the glass causing the bubbles to collect at 'peaks' on the glass surface (since the glass is not completely smooth). The effect is similar to raindrops falling off a leaf.

The reason that bubbles travel in straight lines is simple enough.



If you find the language barrier difficult, I'm sure that Clausius2 would be happy to respond to a private message in Spanish.
 
Here is a question for you:

Why do the bubbles form? And why don't they form before you open the bottle, only after?
 
Oxymoron said:
Here is a question for you:

Why do the bubbles form? And why don't they form before you open the bottle, only after?

Becouse of the presure?

I think that the liquid part has a cuantity of gas, that only "escapes" when presure is not atmosferic.

I don't know exactly, only is a suposition.

And, what about the incremental mass becouse of the "induced mass"?
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
9K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K