Can't get Hamilton and Lagrangian stuff

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter finchie_88
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hamilton Lagrangian
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the confusion and challenges faced by a participant in understanding Hamiltonian and Lagrangian mechanics, particularly in deriving equations for complex systems. The scope includes conceptual clarifications and technical explanations related to these formulations of mechanics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion in deriving equations for complex systems, stating they can only manage simple cases like an object falling.
  • Another participant suggests that Lagrangian and Hamiltonian mechanics, which focus on scalars like energy, can simplify problems compared to Newtonian mechanics, which deals with vectors and forces.
  • It is proposed that the Lagrangian/Hamiltonian approach is more beneficial in complex scenarios, although the original poster questions its utility, viewing it as merely an alternative to Newtonian mechanics.
  • Additional benefits of the Lagrangian/Hamiltonian framework are mentioned, including ease of solving problems involving conservation laws, flexibility in choosing generalized coordinates, and its connection to the Principle of Stationary Action.
  • Resources are suggested for further study, including Schaum's outlines and specific online materials related to Lagrangian mechanics.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the perceived utility of Lagrangian and Hamiltonian mechanics versus Newtonian mechanics, with some arguing for the advantages of the former while others remain skeptical about its benefits.

Contextual Notes

The discussion reflects varying levels of understanding and comfort with the mathematical formulations involved, as well as differing opinions on the practicality of these approaches in solving physical problems.

finchie_88
I'm really confused when using Hamilton and lagrangian equations, and have read loads of documents on it, but its not getting any clearer, I was hoping someone might be able to help me.
Thanks in advance...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What don't you get? Try to explain to us what you understand. And we'll intercede when you veer off course.
 
I understand the principle of what is happening, its just that I can't come up with the equations myself unless the situation is really simple (like a object falling), anything more complex than that and I get confused. Also, I can't see the point, all it is is another way of writing Newtonian mechanics, what is the benefit of it?
 
finchie_88 said:
I understand the principle of what is happening, its just that I can't come up with the equations myself unless the situation is really simple (like a object falling), anything more complex than that and I get confused. Also, I can't see the point, all it is is another way of writing Newtonian mechanics, what is the benefit of it?

1. Newtonian mechanics deal with VECTORS, as in forces. Lagrangian/Hamiltonian deal with scalars, as in energy. You have ONE less thing to worry about using the latter approach.

2. Because of #1, there are more instances where it is easier to write the Lagrangian/Hamiltonian than to write the Newtonian differential equation of motion. The fact that you are only seeing the introduction to both types of mechanics using simple examples doesn't tell you how well the Lagrangian/Hamiltonian approach is more useful. Wait till you have to deal with more complicated situations.

Zz.
 
finchie_88 said:
Also, I can't see the point, all it is is another way of writing Newtonian mechanics, what is the benefit of it?
more benefits
  • much easier to solve the "roller coaster on a frictionless track" problem... with Newton, you'll have to start by drawing a different Free-Body diagram at each point along the track;
  • "conserved quantities" and "symmetries" are more easily handled.. and exploited;
  • freedom in choosing "[generalized] coordinates" to simplify the mathematics;
  • associated with the "Principle of Stationary Action" (a.k.a. Least Action), which can be used to formulate many theories [optics, electromagnetism, gravitation, other classical field theories]
  • used as a route to Schrödinger and Heisenberg quantum mechanics
When dealing with problems, a good first step is really trying to identify the "degrees of freedom" (i.e., the configuration space) of the system. This suggests a possible set of "generalized coordinates".
Get a hold of the Schaum's outlines on Lagrangian Mechanics.
Flip through http://alamos.math.arizona.edu/~rychlik/557-dir/mechanics/ and http://mitpress.mit.edu/SICM/
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
28
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K