Log Law: Change Base Explained w/Example

  • Thread starter Thread starter dilan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Base Law Log
AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies the change of base formula in logarithms, stating that for positive bases a and b (distinct from 1) and a positive number c, the relationship can be expressed as c = a^(log_a(c)) = b^(log_b(c)). By taking the logarithm with respect to base a on both sides, it leads to the equation log_a(c) = log_b(c) * log_a(b). Consequently, the change of base formula is derived as log_b(c) = log_a(c) / log_a(b). This explanation provides a clear understanding of how to convert logarithms from one base to another. The example effectively illustrates the application of the change of base law.
dilan
Messages
72
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I am just a little confused with this log law of change base. Is there anyone who can give me a clear description with an example?:smile:
Thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Let a,b>0, and distinct from 1 be the respective bases, and let c be an arbitrary positive number.

Then, you evidently have:
c=a^{log_{a}(c)}=b^{log_{b}(c)
Taking the logarithm with respect to a on both sides, you get:
\log_{a}(c)=\log_{b}(c)\log_{a}(b)
that is:
log_{b}(c)=\frac{log_{a}(c)}{log_{a}(b)}
Was that what you're after?
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
44
Views
4K
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
16K
Back
Top