How to Prove [A,B^{n}]=nB^{n-1}[A,B]?

  • Thread starter Thread starter dimensionless
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving a specific commutator relation involving operators A and B in the context of quantum mechanics. The original poster presents the problem of showing that [A,B^n] = nB^{n-1}[A,B], given that A and B commute with their commutator.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the initial formulation of the commutator and explore the implications of the relation [A,BC] = B[A,C] + [A,B]C. Some suggest using recursion to simplify the proof, while others express uncertainty about their understanding of the steps involved.

Discussion Status

Several participants are actively engaging with the problem, sharing different approaches and questioning their own understanding. Some have provided guidance on how to apply known relations to derive the desired result, while others are seeking clarification on the steps involved.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of specific conditions under which the operators A and B commute with their commutator, which may influence the approach to the problem. Additionally, some participants express confusion about the correctness of their initial attempts and the overall process.

dimensionless
Messages
461
Reaction score
1
I'm having trouble figuring out the following commutator relation problem:

Suppose A and B commute with their commutator, i.e., [tex][B,[A,B]]=[A,[A,B]]=0[/tex]. Show that

[tex][A,B^{n}]=nB^{n-1}[A,B][/tex]

I have

[tex][A,B^{n}] = AB^{n} - B^{n}A[/tex]

and also

[tex][A,B^{n}] = AB^{n} - B^{n}A = ABB^{n-1} - BB^{n-1}A[/tex]

I don't know where to go from here. I'm not positive the above relation is correct either.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Nnyambenike
Physics news on Phys.org
dimensionless said:
I'm having trouble figuring out the following commutator relation problem:

Suppose A and B commute with their commutator, i.e., [tex][B,[A,B]]=[A,[A,B]]=0[/tex]. Show that

[tex][A,B^{n}]=nB^{n-1}[A,B][/tex]

I have

[tex][A,B^{n}] = AB^{n} - B^{n}A[/tex]

and also

[tex][A,B^{n}] = AB^{n} - B^{n}A = ABB^{n-1} - BB^{n-1}A[/tex]

I don't know where to go from here. I'm not positive the above relation is correct either.

Do you know the relation

[A,BC] = B[A,C] + [A,B] C

?

It's easy to prove. Just expand out.

Now, use with [itex]C= B^{n-1}[/itex].
, that is use [itex][A,B^n] = B[A,B^{n-1}] + [A,B] B^{n-1}[/itex].
Now, repeat this again on the first term using now [itex]C= B^{n-2}[/itex]. You will get a recursion formula that will give you the proof easily.
 
Help! I need to do this same exact problem. But I just don't understand what to do so I was wondering if you wouldn't mind showing the steps that you explained to do in order to get the final solution. Thank you so much!
 
i also need to answer the same problem for my quantum physics course. thank you.
 
Here's another way:

[tex]AB^n = (AB)B^{n-1}[/tex]
[tex]=(BA+[A,B])B^{n-1}[/tex]
[tex]=BAB^{n-1} + [A,B]B^{n-1}[/tex]

Can you understand each step?

Now repeat on the first term on the right. Keep going until you end up with [itex]B^n A[/itex] plus some other stuff. According to the statement of the problem, the other stuff should end up being [itex]n[A,B]B^{n-1}[/itex]. It's crucial that [itex][A,B][/itex] commutes with [itex]B[/itex] to get this final result.
 
wohow! thanks Avodynefor the reply. got mixed up. my work all ended as a never ending subtraction of powers ofB. thanks for the idea.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
8K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K