Thread Closed

Couple of log questions

 
Share Thread Thread Tools
Jan10-09, 04:09 PM   #1
 

Couple of log questions


1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
1.) 3logx2y + 2logxy
2.) 4logabc - 2loga2b - 3logbc




2. Relevant equations



3. The attempt at a solution
I know that 3logx2 is the same as 6logx but I don't know what to do since theres a y there
PhysOrg.com
PhysOrg
science news on PhysOrg.com

>> Bird's playlist could signal mental strengths and weaknesses
>> Minus environment, patterns still emerge: Computational study tracks E. coli cells' regulatory mechanisms
>> Bacterium uses natural 'thermometer' to trigger diarrheal disease, scientists find
Jan10-09, 04:30 PM   #2
 
What is the question? If it's to simplify as much as possible, you can use log(xy) = log(x) + log(y).
Jan10-09, 04:44 PM   #3
 
Yep thats the question. I'm just confused about what to do with all these coefficients.
Is 3logx2y the same as logx6y3??

Can I write logx6y3 as logx[sup]6[/sup + log]y3 or do I have to get rid of them powers first?
Jan10-09, 04:45 PM   #4
 

Couple of log questions


Yes assuming x^2y are both an argument of your log
Jan10-09, 05:27 PM   #5
 
Blog Entries: 27
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Homework Helper Homework Help
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Quote by MadmanMurray View Post
Can I write logx6y3 as logx6 + logy3 or do I have to get rid of them powers first?
Hi MadmanMurray!

I'm guessing that they want it in the form 6logx + 3logy.

(after all, how would you look up logx6 in log-tables if x = 2.345? … you'd have to find 2.3456 first, and the only way of doing that is to … yes!! )
Jan10-09, 05:52 PM   #6
 
Thanks a lot.

I have 2 more log questions in front of me that are confusing as hell too:
1.) log (x2 + 2) = 2.6

and

2.) 2x + 1 = 32x - 1

For the first one there I was wondering if I can express it like this 2logx + 2? Can I do that?
Jan10-09, 05:58 PM   #7
 
Blog Entries: 27
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Homework Helper Homework Help
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Quote by MadmanMurray View Post
1.) log (x2 + 2) = 2.6

I was wondering if I can express it like this 2logx + 2? Can I do that?
Nooo … that woud be (logx2) +2

Hint: if loga = b, then a = eb
Jan10-09, 06:15 PM   #8
 
Careful tiny-tim: log(a) doesn't necessarily refer to the natural logarithm. log(a) commonly refers to the logarithm base 10 as well.
Jan10-09, 09:16 PM   #9
 
Recognitions:
Homework Helper Homework Help
if log X = Y, then X = B^Y (where B is the base of the log)
If it doesn't make sense in logarithm land, transform it to power land!
And vice versa.
Jan11-09, 04:23 AM   #10
 
Quote by jgens View Post
Careful tiny-tim: log(a) doesn't necessarily refer to the natural logarithm. log(a) commonly refers to the logarithm base 10 as well.
Well, where I study lg is decimal logarithm, ln is natural logarithm and log refers to a logarithm with any other base which is shown in subscript right after the log symbol. For example log[tex]_{2}[/tex]8 = 3 ( I don't know why, but using LaTex here shows a subscript as a superscript on my machine. The 2 is supposed to be as a subscript. I hope you get the idea), lg100 = 2 and ln(e[tex]^{2}[/tex]) = 2.
Jan11-09, 04:35 AM   #11
 
Blog Entries: 27
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Homework Helper Homework Help
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Quote by kbaumen View Post
For example log[itex]_{2}[/itex]8 = 3 ( I don't know why, but using LaTex here shows a subscript as a superscript on my machine.
Hi kbaumen!

You have to use "inline" LaTeX (typing "itex" instead of "tex") if you're inserting into a line of text (see just above) …

but it's much better, on this forum, to use the X2 or X2 tags (just above the reply box), especially since any LaTeX takes up a lot of space on the server.
Jan11-09, 04:42 AM   #12
 
Quote by tiny-tim View Post
Hi kbaumen!

You have to use "inline" LaTeX (typing "itex" instead of "tex") if you're inserting into a line of text (see just above) …

but it's much better, on this forum, to use the X2 or X2 tags (just above the reply box), especially since any LaTeX takes up a lot of space on the server.
Oh. Thanks a lot for the explanation.
Jan11-09, 05:19 AM   #13
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Retired Staff Staff Emeritus
Quote by MadmanMurray View Post
Thanks a lot.

I have 2 more log questions in front of me that are confusing as hell too:
1.) log (x2 + 2) = 2.6
Then x2+ 2= a2.6 where "a" is the base of the logarithm (probably 10 or e).

and

2.) 2x + 1 = 32x - 1
Since there exponentials are to different bases, which cannot be converted to one another, there is no easy way to solve this equation.

For the first one there I was wondering if I can express it like this 2logx + 2? Can I do that?
Jan11-09, 07:50 AM   #14
 
Quote by HallsofIvy View Post
Since there exponentials are to different bases, which cannot be converted to one another, there is no easy way to solve this equation.
I decided to plug in some random numbers and the first one I plugged in (1) happened to work. Since theres no simple way to solve it maybe thats what I was meant to do.
Thread Closed
Thread Tools


Similar Threads for: Couple of log questions
Thread Forum Replies
A couple questions, Introductory Physics Homework 6
a couple of questions Introductory Physics Homework 4
A couple of questions General Physics 6
A couple of Questions.. can someone help me? General Discussion 4
help with a couple of questions Introductory Physics Homework 1