Complex voltage across a capacitor

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the value of a capacitor given a complex voltage and purely reactive power. The voltage across the capacitor is defined as 200 + 100j V at 60 Hz, while the reactive power is -50000j VA. The impedance of the capacitor is derived using the formula Z = (V*V) / Power, leading to a complex component in the capacitor's value. The participant expresses confusion regarding the non-zero phase of the voltage relative to the purely reactive nature of the capacitor, suggesting potential miscommunication in the problem statement.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of complex numbers in electrical engineering
  • Familiarity with AC circuit analysis
  • Knowledge of impedance calculations for capacitors
  • Proficiency in using power equations in electrical systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the relationship between voltage, current, and impedance in AC circuits
  • Learn about the implications of phase angles in reactive components
  • Explore the concept of complex power and its applications in circuit analysis
  • Investigate the effects of internal resistance in capacitors on circuit behavior
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineering students, circuit designers, and professionals analyzing AC circuits and reactive components.

preet
Messages
96
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I'm given the power for a capacitor. I know the voltage across the capacitor has a complex component. How do I find the value of the capacitor?

Power (purely reactive) = -50000j VA
Voltage = 200 + 100j V @ 60 Hz


Homework Equations


Power = (V*V) / Z
Impedance of a capacitor = -j / (2*pi*f*C)



The Attempt at a Solution


(200 + 100j)^2 / Z = -50000j
(30000+40000j) / -50000j = Z
-j / (2*pi*f*C) = (0.8 - 0.6j)
-j / (0.8 - 0.6j) = 2*pi*f*C

C -> complex?


I get a complex component in the value of C
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The voltage and capacitor current are not orthogonal. I think its strange though that the voltage was defined with a non-zero phase... compared to what?? Either that cap has some internal resistance, or there's a mistake in the givens, or you are suppose to assume the stated phase of the applied voltage is a phase from some other unrelated signal (but the cap phase given is NOT relative to that phase!), and therefore normalize the applied voltage to zero phase (which would mean its a bad question, IMO). I wouldn't feel comfortable assuming any of those unless your teacher wants you to notice the cap has internal resistance and has intentionally defined zero-phase as 90 degrees from the current's phase--which is a rather weird thing to do. But then if the teacher specified the cap is "purely reactive" with no real component, yet defined the applied voltage as having a non-zero phase, then its time to ask your teacher what the heck he meant.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K