Clarifying Open String Hamiltonian for Witten's Book

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter cuerdero
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hamiltonian String
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the open string Hamiltonian as presented in Witten's book, specifically the equation H=\int\,d\sigma(\dot{X}.P_{\tau}-L)=\frac{T}{2}\int(\dot{X}^{2}+X'^{2})d\sigma. Participants clarify that the Hamiltonian is zero on-shell due to diffeomorphism invariance, similar to the Hamiltonian in general relativity. This leads to a deeper exploration of the implications of the Virasoro operators and the mass of the string, referencing classical and quantum mechanical derivations from "A First Course in String Theory" (2nd Edition, Cambridge).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Hamiltonian mechanics
  • Familiarity with string theory concepts
  • Knowledge of diffeomorphism invariance
  • Basic grasp of Virasoro operators
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Hamiltonian formulation of general relativity
  • Learn about diffeomorphism invariance in theoretical physics
  • Examine the derivation of mass for open strings in "A First Course in String Theory"
  • Research the role of Virasoro operators in string theory
USEFUL FOR

The discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, string theorists, and graduate students seeking to deepen their understanding of Hamiltonian dynamics in the context of string theory and general relativity.

cuerdero
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
trying to get the open string hamiltonian I use
<br /> H=\int\,d\sigma(\dot{X}.P_{\tau}-L)=\frac{T}{2}\int(\dot{X}^{2}+X&#039;^{2})d\sigma<br />
as in Witten´s book, but we are integrating the Virasoro constraint equal to zero.
So, Is not the Hamiltonian zero?
Please, clarifyme this equation.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Please, I can´t get the answer..
Thank you
 
Yes, it's zero! In fact the Hamiltonian is zero (on shell) for any system with diffeomorphism invariance. In the Hamiltonian formulation of general relativity, the Hamiltonian is also zero. (Therefore it doesn't make much sense to talk about energy in GR, though people can get agitated about this issue...)
 
Yeah any parametrization invariance leads to this. You can consider just a simple point particle, not even a string, for the hamiltonian to vanish.
 
See the end of this page

http://www.physics.thetangentbundle.net/wiki/String_theory/relativistic_point_particle/action
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks to everyone, it was really helpful...but my next question is:
what about the Virasoro operators and the mass of the string?
 
http://www.scribd.com/doc/17025413/A-First-Course-in-String-Theory-2nd-Edition-Cambridge-2009" derives the mass of an open string, first classically (equation 9.83) and then quantum mechanically (equation 12.108). We can discuss the logic of this derivation if you like.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
thanks a lot..now I can see it better
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K