Bystander's latest activity
-
Bystander reacted to berkeman's post in the thread What type of energy is actually stored inside an atom? with
Agree.
After a Mentor discussion, the thread will remain closed. The OP's comments are borderline personal speculation, which we do not allow. -
Bystander reacted to mfb's post in the thread New person here, where do I post my own personal hypothesis? with
Agree.
No website that accepts this is worth a recommendation. You are not the first who thinks they can revolutionize physics based on some... -
Bystander reacted to Borek's post in the thread Why have the number of questions declined over recent years? with
Agree.
Several processes - one is that at some point "all questions were already answered", quite often it was enough to google for problem to... -
Bystander reacted to martinbn's post in the thread New person here, where do I post my own personal hypothesis? with
Agree.
No, not here. -
Bystander reacted to davenn's post in the thread Mag 7.6 - 73 km ENE of Misawa, Japan, tsunami warning issued with
Informative.
This has been a significant quake and not directly related to the Mw9.1 megathrust quake that occurred on 11 March 2011 at 05:46 UTC... -
Bystander reacted to Andy Resnick's post in the thread The Secrets of Prof. Verschure's Rosetta Stones with
Like.
Carbonatite, Fen complex. The Fen Complex experienced pluri-metasomatic processes consisting of at least two main phases of... -
Bystander reacted to DEvens's post in the thread Correct statement about random process of radioactive decay with
Agree.
It's a multiple choice question. Usually you are advised to look for the "most correct" answer. Ordinarily multiple choice are for cases... -
Bystander reacted to jbriggs444's post in the thread Correct statement about random process of radioactive decay with
Agree.
An exponential distribution is an exponential distribution. The only difference is scale. I suspect that you are comparing the elapsed...