Random Thoughts 7

  • Thread starter Thread starter Evo
  • Start date Start date
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2,033 replies · 81K views
Physics news on Phys.org
Hopefully not a self-inflicted mishap with her ban hammer. :olduhh:

But yeah, I haven't seen her in a while either. Hope she's doing OK.
 
No matter how I explained it, I could not get Chat GPT to tell me how much wood my woodchuck could chuck - even after stating that my woodchuck could chuck wood. I may never know.
 
Borg said:
No matter how I explained it, I could not get Chat GPT to tell me how much wood my woodchuck could chuck - even after stating that my woodchuck could chuck wood. I may never know.
How much chat could a chatbot bot if a chatbot could bot chat?

(The meaning of "bot" as a verb is left to the reader's imagination.)
 
Ibix said:
How much chat could a chatbot bot if a chatbot could bot chat?

(The meaning of "bot" as a verb is left to the reader's imagination.)
bot comes directly from robot (Slavian for to work).

German lexicon:
English robot (< Czech robot, to: robota, robot); after the name of the US company “Rossum's Universal Robots” appearing in the 1920 social-utopian drama “R.U.R.” by the Czech writer K. Čapek (1890–1938).
https://www.duden.de/rechtschreibung/Roboter

English lexikon:
1923, "mechanical person," also "person whose work or activities are entirely mechanical," from the English translation of the 1920 play "R.U.R." ("Rossum's Universal Robots") by Karel Capek (1890-1938), from Czech robotnik "forced worker," from robota "forced labor, compulsory service, drudgery," from robotiti "to work, drudge," from an Old Czech source akin to Old Church Slavonic rabota "servitude," from rabu "slave" (from Old Slavic *orbu-, from PIE *orbh- "pass from one status to another;"
https://www.etymonline.com/search?q=robot
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Klystron and dextercioby
I got my first Chat GPT-like LLM running today that allows me to ask questions about my own documents. I'm having too much fun with this.

:partytime:
 
Reply
  • Wow
Likes   Reactions: Wrichik Basu
Saw this book, recommended it to my friend, telling her I thought of her when I saw it, just to play with her head:
Screenshot_20231027_144801_Samsung Internet.jpg
 
The research paper is a free PDF file at:
https://www2.psych.ubc.ca/~henrich/pdfs/WeirdPeople.pdf
doi:10.1017/S0140525X0999152X

75 pages including 13 pages of references.

The WEIRD is an acronym for:
"Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, and Democratic (WEIRD)" societies.

Could be an interesting read, think I'll print it for bedtime reading.

Cheers,
Tom

p.s. Amazon has a Kindle version for USD 12.99 and some hardcover, new and used, around USD 20.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: WWGD
WWGD said:
Just wanted to have the first " civilian" post in RT 7. Edit: GA!.

Edit: Edit: Removed mine [fresh_42].
What?

BTW, RT 6 reached 11,072. Seemed an odd number to cut off on.

Anyway, pretty shocked at Matthew Perry news. I was forced to watch friends by an Ex and pretty much liked it from the off. I can remember the episode. He popped up in The West wing and was a good character there too. 54 is young but he had some problems historically. RIP
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: WWGD
pinball1970 said:
What?

BTW, RT 6 reached 11,072. Seemed an odd number to cut off on.

Anyway, pretty shocked at Matthew Perry news. I was forced to watch friends by an Ex and pretty much liked it from the off. I can remember the episode. He popped up in The West wing and was a good character there too. 54 is young but he had some problems historically. RIP
Yes, RIP. Friends seemed to inspire strong reactions for or against. I was one of the few I know who felt neutral towards it.
 
WWGD said:
Yes, RIP. Friends seemed to inspire strong reactions for or against. I was one of the few I know who felt neutral towards it.
I cannot see many of the STEM guys being overly keen on it, Friends does have a strong defender in Science however, Ross!
 
pinball1970 said:
I cannot see many of the STEM guys being overly keen on it, Friends does have a strong defender in Science however, Ross!
Who's depicted as a nerd in that regard, i.e., the other friends kind of mock, dismiss it.
 
fresh_42 said:
As odd as any other number, and it was probably missed dozens of times of waiting and forgetting at any other non-odd number before.

$$
11072=2^6\cdot 173=2^5(7^3+3)=16^2+104^2\,|\,93^{16}-1
$$
As odd as any even number can be!
Edit: Thanks for letting me have the first " Civilian" post in RT 7.
 
Last edited:
WWGD said:
Who's depicted as a nerd in that regard, i.e., the other friends kind of mock, dismiss it.
Yes and no, only the same way they mock Joey for being as struggling actor or Phoebe's awful guitar playing. They support them too.
 
pinball1970 said:
Yes and no, only the same way they mock Joey for being as struggling actor or Phoebe's awful guitar playing. They support them too.
True, I guess it's in-between.
I found Phoebes " Smelly cat" bit cringy and thoroughly unfunny, though.
I guess I'm more the " Raymond" type, though they were kind of cruel at times.
 
WWGD said:
True, I guess it's in-between.
I found Phoebes " Smelly cat" bit cringy and thoroughly unfunny, though.
I guess I'm more the " Raymond" type, though they were kind of cruel at times.
I guess there were mainly 3 sitcoms back then: Seinfeld, Raymond, Friends.

I liked the first 2, Friends only so-so.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: pinball1970
That founding emphasized secularity and healthy distance from religious content.
No wonder it's a sensitive topic there these days.

WWGD said:
...crispy bacon...
Secularity. Just secularity. Pork is still not a good match.... o0)
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: WWGD
Rive said:
That founding emphasized secularity and healthy distance from religious content.
No wonder it's a sensitive topic there these days.Secularity. Just secularity. Pork is still not a good match.... o0)
True, I'm being a bit indelicate here. No offense meant.
Would have been interesting if the anniversary coincided with Halloween.
 
Last edited:
WWGD said:
No offense meant
I don't think anybody took any, it was just kind of ... funnily inappropriate :wink:
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: pinball1970