Recent content by c++guru
-
C
Undergrad Solve Physics Puzzle Problem - 200 Puzzling Physics Problems
That solution on the back makes no sense linguistically. Here is my thinking: In the worst case scenario the bowl would be turning around the center of the circle it is a half of. Since the left most point on the bowl goes up by 10cm the right most point must go down 10cm, and this is exactly...- c++guru
- Post #10
- Forum: Classical Physics
-
C
Undergrad Solve Physics Puzzle Problem - 200 Puzzling Physics Problems
So I've been trying to do some physics puzzles and I've come across this in a book called "200 puzzling physics problems." The solution in the back makes no sense to me and I can't seem to figure it out by myself. Can anyone help me?- c++guru
- Thread
- Classical Fluids Physics Puzzle Torque
- Replies: 11
- Forum: Classical Physics
-
C
Graduate How to evaluate a triangular fermion loop
I end up with this How in the world do I do this integral?- c++guru
- Post #3
- Forum: High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
-
C
Graduate How to evaluate a triangular fermion loop
Say I have a scalar field which decays into to a fermion - anti fermion pair which then interact in a closed loop to produce two photons. How would I evaluate this? Can I just follow the loop backwards from any of the two photon vertices and just write vertex factor, propogator, vertex factor...- c++guru
- Thread
- Fermion Loop
- Replies: 3
- Forum: High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
-
C
Graduate Amplitude for scalar-proca couplings
Then $$\epsilon_{\mu}^{*}\epsilon^{\mu *}$$ evaluates to 0? The makes sense, the probability should be zero, since the spins must be opposite. So I guess it evaluates to -1 if the spins are different? If I make the other $$\epsilon_{\mu}^{*} = (0,1,-i,0)^{\mu}/\sqrt{2} $$ Then...- c++guru
- Post #5
- Forum: High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
-
C
Graduate Amplitude for scalar-proca couplings
But -k is unit less. Am I wrong to thing that the two epsilons go to -1 if the spins are the same and 0 otherwise? Or is the -1 in units of energy?- c++guru
- Post #3
- Forum: High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
-
C
Graduate Amplitude for scalar-proca couplings
I'm trying to calculate the amplitude for an interaction between a scalar field $$\phi$$ and two identical spin 1 fields $$A_{\mu} \quad and \quad A^{\mu}$$ for the interaction $$\phi \longrightarrow A^{\mu} A_{\mu}$$ with the Lagrangian density $$L_{int} = -ik\phi A^{\mu} A_{\mu}$$ where k is a...- c++guru
- Thread
- Amplitude Feynman diagram
- Replies: 5
- Forum: High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
-
C
Graduate Can a W+ boson couple to a W- boson?
Can a W+ boson couple to a W- boson? Say, if a Higgs decays into a W+ and a W-, what would be the Lagrangian density for this interaction? How would you evaluate such a first order diagram?- c++guru
- Thread
- Boson Couple Feynman diagram
- Replies: 3
- Forum: High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
-
C
Graduate Evaluating $$\alpha \longrightarrow \beta + \overline{\beta}$$ Feynman Diagram
Of Course I believe the amplitude simply evaluates to $$ k\overline{U}^{(s)}V^{(s)}$$ where U is the spinor of the Beta and V is the spinor of the anti Beta, just from simply accounting for the spinors and the vertex factor.- c++guru
- Post #5
- Forum: High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
-
C
Graduate Evaluating $$\alpha \longrightarrow \beta + \overline{\beta}$$ Feynman Diagram
Could you please give me an explicit expression? I'm not sure mine is correct.- c++guru
- Post #3
- Forum: High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
-
C
Graduate Evaluating $$\alpha \longrightarrow \beta + \overline{\beta}$$ Feynman Diagram
If I have a scalar field $$\alpha$$ and a Dirac particle $$\beta$$ and its anti particle $$\overline{\beta}$$ such that the three couple to give a vertex factor of $$-ik$$ when evaluating the Feynman diagram (where k is an arbitrary constant). How do I evaluate the first order diagram of...- c++guru
- Thread
- Beta Diagram Feynman Feynman diagram
- Replies: 4
- Forum: High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics