phinds's latest activity
-
phinds replied to the thread I What Are the Limits of the Universe According to Cosmologists?.Just FYI, you mean "moot", not "mute". -
phinds replied to the thread Collection of Lame Jokes.Well, English has a a few instances where confusion results from such things. I've never kept track of them but have noticed a few over... -
phinds replied to the thread Collection of Lame Jokes.They started out from different languages. derivation: We get inflammable from the Latin verb inflammare, which combines flammare ("to... -
phinds reacted to Jaime Rudas's post in the thread I What Are the Limits of the Universe According to Cosmologists? with
Like.
The best model of the universe we have (the ΛCDM model) is fully compatible with both a finite and infinite universe. Moreover, the most... -
phinds replied to the thread I What Are the Limits of the Universe According to Cosmologists?.If it is infinite now then it HAD to be infinite at the time of the singularity because you can't get from finite to infinite The... -
phinds replied to the thread Hello from a new member!.Welcome to the forum -
phinds reacted to Dale's post in the thread Help me understand why “Block Universe” is not scientifically proven with
Like.
The debates about probabilities in QM are far stronger than the debates about the block universe. However, I think that you miss the... -
phinds replied to the thread Collection of Lame Jokes.Which is why America has a more vibrant economy. We are faster. :smile: -
phinds replied to the thread I The Physics of unloading sand from a barge.I believe you are correct. I've done this sort of thing before (not to THIS scales, but ...) This guy is doing it the most efficient... -
phinds reacted to renormalize's post in the thread I Gravitational self-interaction: another attempt to replace Dark Matter with
Informative.
Having not read this paper I offer no opinion on its physics content. But with regard to its "seriosity" I will just point out that... -
phinds replied to the thread I Is there a bad intuition or bad explanation in quantum entanglement?.QM is KNOWN to be incomplete, although not regarding entanglement (I make no argument either way on that) but rather because it cannot...
