Problem about a cone and plane cutting it

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Julio
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cone Cutting Plane
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a geometric problem involving a cone and a plane that intersects it. Participants explore the conditions under which the plane can cut the cone into two parts of equal volume, examining the relationship between the angle of the plane and the height at which it intersects the cone.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that the problem is ill-posed due to the infinite solutions depending on the height of the plane rather than solely the angle.
  • Others propose that the cutting plane should intersect the base of the cone at its outer edge, noting that the angle depends on the height/radius ratio.
  • A participant mentions the need to consider the orientation of the plane and the nature of the intersection with the z=0 plane, raising questions about the specific lines of intersection.
  • There is a discussion about the relationship between the area of the cut and the volume of the cone, with some participants asserting that the area of the cut will be larger than half the base.
  • Participants debate the correct formula for the volume of the resulting shape after the cut, with references to the height of the perpendicular from the apex to the cutting plane.
  • Some participants express uncertainty about the applicability of certain formulas and definitions related to elliptic cones versus right circular cones.
  • One participant questions whether the plane can be moved to cut the cone vertically in half, suggesting a potential misunderstanding of the problem constraints.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the problem, as multiple competing views and uncertainties about the geometry and calculations remain evident throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include unresolved assumptions about the orientation of the cutting plane, the dependence on the height of the cut, and the applicability of certain geometric definitions. The discussion reflects various interpretations of the problem and the mathematical relationships involved.

Julio
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
It has a straight cone and a plane that cuts it as shown in the image. What angle should the plane form with the base of the cone ?, so that the plane cuts the cone in 2 parts of equal volume.

Cono.jpg
 

Attachments

  • Cono.jpg
    Cono.jpg
    11.3 KB · Views: 1,121
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to the PF. Is this question for schoolwork?
 
Hello, no, it's a cuirosidad. I try to resolve, however, I can not remember how.
 
Julio said:
Hello, no, it's a cuirosidad. I try to resolve, however, I can not remember how.
Fair enough. Do you remember how to use integration to calculate the volume between planes and other surfaces?
 
The problem is ill-posed. It has an infinitude of solutions as it's depending on the height of the plane above ground it cuts cone rather than the angle.

For example if my quick calculations are correct, for angle 0 degrees of plane parallel to ground a solution would be: ## h-\frac {h} { \sqrt[3] 2} ##.
 
Based on the image I guess the cutting plane should intersect the floor of the cone at the outer edge of the base.
The angle will still depend on the height/radius ratio but that dependence is trivial.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
mfb said:
Based on the image I guess the cutting plane should intersect the floor of the cone at the outer edge of the base.
The angle will still depend on the height/radius ratio but that dependence is trivial.
I see..

Still it depends on the orientation of the plane then. Is the line of cut of the tilted plane with the z=0 plane the x=0 line, the y=x line? there are y=nx solutions...

For the simplest case, here's a reference: http://mathworld.wolfram.com/EllipticCone.html
 
Last edited:
Rada Demorn said:
Still it depends on the orientation of the plane then. Is the line of cut of the tilted plane with the z=0 plane the x=0 line, the y=x line? there are y=nx solutions...
One assumes the intersection of the tilted plane with the z=0 plane forms a line which is expected to be tangent to the base of the cone. And one assumes a right circular cone.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman and mfb
So. find the major and minor semi-axes a,b of the ellipse as functions of the angle of tilted plane and pluck them in ## a.b = r^2 /2 ##

Good luck with the calculations!
 
  • #10
OP asked about the volumes not about the area of the cut. The area of the cut will be larger than half the base.
 
  • #11
mfb said:
OP asked about the volumes not about the area of the cut. The area of the cut will be larger than half the base.
Huh?

Volume of elliptic cone is half the volume of original cone. So, ##
π.a.b.h/3 = π.h.r^2 /6 =>
a.b = r^2 /2
##

Where did you see an area?
 
  • #12
On second thought ##

a.b = r^2 /2 ## is not the right formula to be used...

The definition of an elliptic cone given in http://mathworld.wolfram.com/EllipticCone.html is not applicable in this case. What we are having here is a right circular cone cut by an oblique plane.

So in ##
π.a.b.h'/3 = π.h.r^2 /6 ## I would be using h' instead where h' is the height of the perpendicular drawn from the apex of the cone to the oblique cutting plane.
Again I am not certain about this so you must wait until I verify this.
 
  • #13
Yes, ##
π.a.b.h'/3 = π.h.r^2 /6 ## where h' is the height of the perpendicular drawn from the apex of the cone to the oblique cutting plane and h,r the height and radius of the original cone is the correct formula to be used!
 
  • #14
The upper volume is not an elliptic cone although it happens to have the same volume as one.
Rada Demorn said:
Yes, ##
π.a.b.h'/3 = π.h.r^2 /6 ## where h' is the height of the perpendicular drawn from the apex of the cone to the oblique cutting plane and h,r the height and radius of the original cone is the correct formula to be used!
That is better, and h'<h is the reason your previous approach didn't work.

Define ##L=\sqrt{h^2 + r^2/4}##, the distance between apex and the circumference of the intersection between cone and horizontal plane. Define ##\alpha## to be the angle between cone and horizontal surface and ##\gamma## to be the angle between cut plane and horizontal surface. Define ##\beta= \pi - 2 \alpha## (angle at the apex). Then ##h' = L \sin(\alpha - \gamma)##.
From the law of sines we get ##\frac{L}{\sin(\alpha+\gamma)} = \frac{a}{\sin(\beta)}##.
Now we just have to find b.
 
  • #15
Can you move the plane?(Since I didn’t see any post above says that you can,t) if so,can you use the plane to cut the cone vertically in half?(This is quite ridiculous since some actual attempts have been mentioned above)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K