I Instantaneous electric field solved by extended electrodynamics?

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around the implications of the Helmholtz theorem and the Coulomb gauge in electrodynamics, particularly regarding the instantaneous nature of the longitudinal electric field, which raises concerns about causality. The introduction of extended electrodynamics, including Feynman's gauge fixing term, allows for a modified approach to the equations of motion without the need for explicit gauge conditions. This leads to wave equations for the scalar and vector potentials that incorporate retarded solutions, thus aligning with causality principles. Ultimately, the conversation concludes that there is no causality issue in standard electromagnetism, despite initial concerns regarding the measurability of the longitudinal electric field. The topic highlights the balance between theoretical frameworks and physical interpretations in electromagnetic theory.
Bob44
Messages
15
Reaction score
1
The Helmholtz theorem states that any vector field can be uniquely decomposed into longitudinal (curl free) and transverse (divergence free) parts
$$\mathbf{E}=\mathbf{E}_\parallel+\mathbf{E}_\perp.\tag{1}$$
We take the Coulomb gauge
$$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A}_C=0\tag{2}$$
so that
$$
\begin{eqnarray}
\mathbf{E}_\parallel &=& -\nabla \Phi_C,\tag{3}\\
\mathbf{E}_\perp &=& - \frac{\partial \mathbf{A}_C}{\partial t}.\tag{4}
\end{eqnarray}
$$
By Gauss's law we have
$$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{E}=\nabla \cdot \mathbf{E}_\parallel=\frac{\rho}{\varepsilon_0}.\tag{5}$$
By substituting eqn.##(3)## into eqn.##(5)## we obtain the Poisson equation
$$\nabla^2 \Phi_C=-\frac{\rho}{\varepsilon_0}\tag{6}$$
which has the general instantaneous solution
$$\Phi_C(\mathbf{r},t)=\frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\int \frac{\rho(\mathbf{r}',t)}{|\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r}'|}d^3r'.\tag{7}$$
Therefore by eqn.##(3)## the longitudinal electric field ##\mathbf{E}_\parallel=-\nabla\Phi_C(\mathbf{r},t)## depends instantaneously on the charge density ##\rho(\mathbf{r}',t)##.

As the longitudinal electric field ##\mathbf{E}_\parallel## is measurable it seems like we have a problem with causality.

Now consider extended electrodynamics as described in this paper by Lee Hively and Andrew Loebl.

It can be derived from the classical electromagnetic Lagrangian with the addition of Feynman's gauge fixing term
$$\mathcal{L}=-\frac{1}{4}F_{\mu\nu}F^{\mu\nu}-j^\mu A_\mu - \frac{1}{2}(\partial_\mu A^\mu)^2.\tag{8}$$
By using a Lagrangian equivalent to eqn.##(8)## Feynman was able to derive quantum electrodynamics using the path integral approach without the infinities due to overcounting physically identical states that occurs with the fully gauge-invariant standard electromagnetic Lagrangian.

The equations of motion of eqn.##(8)## are given by
$$\partial_\nu F^{\nu\mu}+\partial^\mu(\partial_\alpha A^\alpha)=j^\mu.\tag{9}$$
By using the identity
$$\partial_\nu F^{\nu\mu}=\Box A^\mu-\partial^\mu(\partial_\alpha A^\alpha)\tag{10}$$
we can substitute eqn.##(10)## into eqn.##(9)## in order to derive the wave equations
$$\Box A^\mu=j^\mu\tag{11}$$
without any need to explicitly fix a gauge condition as done in standard electrodynamics.

The equations of motion ##(9)## are equivalent to the following modified inhomogeneous Maxwell equations
$$
\begin{eqnarray}
\nabla \cdot \mathbf{E}&=&\frac{\rho}{\varepsilon_0}-\frac{\partial C}{\partial t},\tag{12}\\
\nabla \times \mathbf{B}&=&\mu_0 \mathbf{J} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \mathbf{E}}{\partial t}+\nabla C\tag{13}
\end{eqnarray}
$$
where the scalar ##C## is given by
$$C=\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}.\tag{14}$$
In order that the scalar field ##C## in eqn.##(14)## is physical we must obey a restricted gauge invariance such that ##\Box \Lambda=0## when ##\phi\rightarrow\phi-\partial\Lambda/\partial t## and ##\mathbf{A}\rightarrow\mathbf{A}+\nabla\Lambda##.

If we take the divergence of eqn.##(13)## and substitute in eqn.##(12)## we find the following wave equation for the scalar ##C## given by
$$\nabla^2 C - \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2 C}{\partial t^2}=-\mu_0\left(\frac{\partial \rho}{\partial t}+\nabla \cdot \mathbf{J}\right).\tag{15}$$
As the righthand side is zero by the continuity relation then eqn.##(15)## reduces to a homogeneous equation.

In ##3##D vector form eqn.##(11)## gives the following wave equations for the scalar potential ##\phi## and vector potential ##\mathbf{A}##:
$$
\begin{eqnarray}
\nabla^2 \phi - \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2 \phi}{\partial t^2}&=&-\frac{\rho}{\varepsilon_0},\tag{16}\\
\nabla^2 \mathbf{A} - \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2 \mathbf{A}}{\partial t^2}&=&-\mu_0\mathbf{J}\tag{17}
\end{eqnarray}
$$
with the general retarded solutions
$$
\begin{eqnarray}
\phi(\mathbf{r},t)&=&\frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\int \frac{\rho(\mathbf{r}',t_r)}{|\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r}'|}d^3r',\tag{18}\\
\mathbf{A}(\mathbf{r},t)&=&\frac{\mu_0}{4\pi}\int \frac{\mathbf{J}(\mathbf{r}',t_r)}{|\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r}'|}d^3r'\tag{19}
\end{eqnarray}
$$
where retarded time ##t_r=t-|\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r}'|/c##.

Now the longitudinal electric field ##\mathbf{E}_\parallel## given by
$$\mathbf{E}_\parallel=-\nabla \phi-\frac{\partial \mathbf{A}_L}{\partial t}\tag{20}$$
depends on the retarded charge density ##\rho(\mathbf{r}',t_r)## and the retarded longitudinal current density ##\mathbf{J}_L(\mathbf{r}',t_r)## so that causality is maintained.

Problem solved?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Bob44 said:
As the longitudinal electric field E∥ is measurable it seems like we have a problem with causality.
There is not a problem with causality in standard electromagnetism, as has been amply demonstrated in your previous threads.

Thread closed.
 
Thread 'The rocket equation, one more time'
I already posted a similar thread a while ago, but this time I want to focus exclusively on one single point that is still not clear to me. I just came across this problem again in Modern Classical Mechanics by Helliwell and Sahakian. Their setup is exactly identical to the one that Taylor uses in Classical Mechanics: a rocket has mass m and velocity v at time t. At time ##t+\Delta t## it has (according to the textbooks) velocity ##v + \Delta v## and mass ##m+\Delta m##. Why not ##m -...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
417
Replies
5
Views
351
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
356
Replies
3
Views
378
Replies
29
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K