Graduate Could there be a "Communication Theorem" instead of a "No-Communication Theorem" in quantum entanglement?

[Quantum_Kevin]

Could there be a "Communication Theorem" instead of a "No-Communication Theorem" in quantum entanglement if we could measure and manipulate negative energy.

According to the ER=EPR conjecture by Susskind and Maldacena, traversable wormholes—which are postulated to require negative energy (or a vacuum force)—might the equivalence lead to a "Communication Theorem"?

Then could the application of negative energy in quantum entanglement bypass the conventional requirement for Bell state measurement and classical communication, which are necessary in standard Quantum Teleportation?

 

[PeterDonis]

traversable wormholes—which are postulated to require negative energy (or a vacuum force)

No, that's not what they require. They require what is called "exotic matter", i.e., stuff that violates the energy conditions that ordinary matter satisfies; but "exotic matter" still has positive energy. What is negative is its pressure.

the application of negative energy in quantum entanglement

There is no such thing. See above.

 

[pines-demon]

According to the ER=EPR conjecture by Susskind and Maldacena, traversable wormholes—which are postulated to require negative energy (or a vacuum force)—might the equivalence lead to a "Communication Theorem"?

Please enlighten us, what are the equations of the ER=EPR conjecture?

 

[PeterDonis]

Please enlighten us, what are the equations of the ER=EPR conjecture?

It's a known conjecture, though speculative:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ER_=_EPR

The OP is simply mistaken about what is actually involved with traversable wormholes.

 

[PeterDonis]

Since the OP question is based on a misconception, which has been corrected, this thread is closed.