Is mathematics invented or discovered?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Meden Agan
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the philosophical question of whether mathematics is invented or discovered. Participants explore various perspectives on the nature of mathematical concepts, their relationship to reality, and the implications of these views for understanding mathematics in the context of physics and other disciplines.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that mathematics involves both invention and discovery, distinguishing between syntax, semantics, and application, and arguing that while symbols and definitions are invented, mathematical truths are discovered once axioms are established.
  • Another participant identifies as a Platonist, asserting that mathematics is discovered, likening it to the uncovering of great compositions or paintings, and using the example of circles to illustrate the distinction between human inventions and mathematical concepts.
  • A different viewpoint questions the binary classification of mathematics as either invented or discovered, proposing the possibility of a third category termed "incovered" or "disvented."
  • One participant argues against the notion that physics is entirely mathematical, suggesting that qualitative observations and experiments can exist independently of mathematical frameworks, referencing historical figures like Faraday.
  • A participant expresses curiosity about the nature of mathematics and its philosophical implications, noting a surprising statement that "mathematics is philosophy."
  • Another participant reflects on the paradox of calling human-defined mathematical objects discovered while simultaneously acknowledging that new combinations of natural phenomena are labeled as inventions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the nature of mathematics, with no clear consensus emerging. Some argue for the discovery perspective, while others advocate for invention, and a few propose alternative categorizations. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing views present.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the complexity of defining mathematical concepts and their relationship to the physical world, indicating that assumptions about the nature of mathematics may vary significantly based on individual perspectives.

  • #61
phyzguy said:
So from that standpoint, when did this invention of the human mind come into existence?
(1) When Galois first wrote about group theory?
(2) When people started studying simple groups?
(3) When someone first realized that this huge group existed?
(4) Since obviously nobody has conceptualized the monster group as a whole, does it exist even now?
Does it have to be exact moment?

Most inventions go through refinement over time. Is one point more valid than all the others? Or more of a Theseus's Ship writ temporal?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #62
DaveC426913 said:
The group - "the primes" - was invented.
In the sense that humans formed the concept and explicitly recognized its properties, sure.

But at least one of those properties--the fact that a prime number has no other factors besides itself and ##1##--is the reason why evolution produced the time periods for cicadas that it did. That reason exists independently of humans and does not require humans to conceptualize it in order to drive an evolutionary process.

So while one could say we humans invented the part that we explicitly formulated, I don't think you can say humans invented the properties that drove evolutionary processes that happened independently of humans and without even requiring humans to exist. Those things, we discovered.
 
  • #63
phyzguy said:
when did this invention of the human mind come into existence?
Invention is a process, not an event. There is no instant of time when an invention "comes into existence". You are trying to draw sharp boundaries in a domain where they simply don't work.
 
  • Wow
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: symbolipoint and BillTre
  • #64
PeterDonis said:
In the sense that humans formed the concept and explicitly recognized its properties, sure.

But at least one of those properties--the fact that a prime number has no other factors besides itself and ##1##--is the reason why evolution produced the time periods for cicadas that it did. That reason exists independently of humans and does not require humans to conceptualize it in order to drive an evolutionary process.

So while one could say we humans invented the part that we explicitly formulated, I don't think you can say humans invented the properties that drove evolutionary processes that happened independently of humans and without even requiring humans to exist. Those things, we discovered.
Exactly correct. My point was that virtually any kind of grouping (though not all) is abstract and created by humans.

Like the monster group and Galois' theorems, where this started (for me) around post 33.
 
  • #65
There's a curious parallel here.

When great authors invent their characters and where they reside, they often find that the story begins to write itself ie they begin to discover things about their characters that they didn't know.

They keep writing because they're invested in their own story.

It seems invention and discovery go hand in hand.

With that thought in mind, our discussion here is like the blind men who describe their meeting with an elephant. Each comes away with a different description and yet others see the creature as an elephant.

Perhaps this a good time to close this thread.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: SammyS, berkeman, weirdoguy and 1 other person

Similar threads

  • · Replies 73 ·
3
Replies
73
Views
8K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 66 ·
3
Replies
66
Views
25K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 137 ·
5
Replies
137
Views
28K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K