Trouble piecing together LS coupling

Click For Summary

SUMMARY

LS coupling, or Russell-Saunders coupling, assumes that the total orbital angular momentum (L) and total spin angular momentum (S) are good quantum numbers because they commute with the atomic Hamiltonian in light atoms. This allows the total angular momentum J to be formed by vector addition of L and S. In heavier atoms, strong spin-orbit coupling breaks the LS coupling approximation, causing L and S to no longer be individually conserved, which permits transitions involving changes in S. The likelihood of spin changes in transitions remains low due to selection rules and weaker spin-flip interactions compared to orbital effects.

PREREQUISITES

  • Quantum numbers and their role in atomic physics
  • Angular momentum addition in quantum mechanics
  • Spin-orbit coupling and its dependence on atomic number
  • Commutation relations with the atomic Hamiltonian

NEXT STEPS

  • Study the mathematical formalism of angular momentum coupling (Clebsch-Gordan coefficients)
  • Explore spin-orbit interaction Hamiltonians in multi-electron atoms
  • Review selection rules governing atomic transitions, especially spin selection rules
  • Analyze the breakdown of LS coupling and the emergence of jj coupling in heavy atoms

USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in atomic physics, spectroscopy, and quantum mechanics who need a clear understanding of angular momentum coupling schemes and their limitations in describing atomic structure and transitions.

AronYstad
Messages
29
Reaction score
3
TL;DR
I've heard a few different statements about LS coupling, but I struggle to see how they relate to each other.
I recently finished my first course in atomic physics, but I don't really feel like I got a good understanding of what LS coupling actually is. At first, we talked about constants of motion and how LS coupling is where we assume that L and S have good quantum numbers, or something similar to that. Then, we talked about addition of angular momenta, and said that with LS coupling, you can add the total L and total S to form J. Later in the course, we talked about heavier atoms and said that when LS coupling doesn't hold anymore, you can for example get transitions with a change in S.

The problem is that I can't find the connections between these statements. So my main questions are:
  1. How do the quantum numbers being good relate to L + S = J?
  2. What is the mechanism behind why LS coupling stops being a good approximation in larger atoms with stronger interactions?
  3. Why can S change in transitions in larger atoms? And why is it very unlikely even when it does happen?
And if you have any more details that would help me understand the concept, please share. I've sent a few messages in the class group chat asking about this, but the others seem to also have the same questions.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
AronYstad said:
TL;DR: I've heard a few different statements about LS coupling, but I struggle to see how they relate to each other.

quantum numbers being good
What is one's understanding of 'good quantum numbers'? Was this subject covered in class?
What is the significance of 'commuting with the Hamiltonian'?

See the following discussion:
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/Atomic/lcoup.html

For multi-electron atoms where the spin-orbit coupling is weak, it can be presumed that the orbital angular momenta of the individual electrons add to form a resultant orbital angular momentum L. . . . .

In light atoms, the interactions between the orbital angular momenta of individual electrons is stronger than the spin-orbit coupling between the spin and orbital angular momenta. These cases are described by "L-S coupling". However, for heavier elements with larger nuclear charge, the spin-orbit interactions become as strong as the interactions between individual spins or orbital angular momenta.

AronYstad said:
Why can S change in transitions in larger atoms?
As in from +1/2 to -1/2, or vice versa?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K