Magmatic-intrusive-breccia/explosion breccia intruding into country rock, Fen complex. The breccia is matrix supported. Most of the clasts are individual fragments of either quartz or feldspar and likely originate from splintering of adjacent country rock (Telemark gneiss):
Clasts are angular and slender with a vaguely trachytic texture. Clast aspect ratio varies from about 1:3 to 1:6, with long sides ranging from about 0.1 mm to 2 mm in length, which I believe classifies all of the clasts as “sand”, so the breccia is well sorted. The ratio of clast to matrix is small, close to 50-50 and there are no open voids.
Matrix appears to be igneous, composed of a mixture of pyroxene and chlorite, perhaps reflecting incomplete chloritization? Etched alteration features are apparent.
The matrix intrudes along microfractures within the country rock (Telemark gneiss).
The gneiss appears weakly altered; there is little to no perthic texture, no albitization, some plagioclase remains present. The gneiss is transected by a set of roughly parallel microfractures; the grains are anhedral. Identifying the minerals has been difficult, often I cannot tell if a grain is quartz or feldspar, and when I can identify a grain as feldspar (a ‘dusty’ appearance in PP), I cannot tell if it is a plagioclase or K-feldspar. Case in point:
At first glance, this seems to be microcline. However, the twinning pattern is fine, indicating anorthoclase. But then, close examination shows the twinning pattern was caused by deformation rather than growth (the inset shows ‘flame twinning’which is diagnostic for deformation twinning). This matters because deformation twinning is associated with plagioclase, not K-feldspar. But there is a cross-hatched pattern which is not associated with plagioclase. Around and around I go…
But wait, there’s more! Some grains show a coarse cross-hatched twinning pattern, but the pattern exhibits 60/120 degree junctions rather than microcline’s 90 degree junctions. In PP, this mineral is clear with low relief, in XP the birefringence is low first order: grey-to-white.
(above): Prominent grain upper center has 60/120 junctions in XP but in PP is indistinguishable from the neighboring quartz grains along the right edge. Lower center, is a more disorganized region that includes a small grain of myrmekite. At bottom, a grain of feldspar with a deformation twinning pattern. The horizontal 'line' cutting across the middle of the image is an artifact.
(above): Matrix and clasts, most clasts are either quartz (clear) or feldspar (dusty appearance), some of the feldspar grains have atypical twinning: 60/120 junctions (bottom) and deformation twinning (top).
(Above) most likely a quartz grain with recrystallization boundaries made vibrantly visible with a quarter-wave (also: glimmer or mica) plate. I can discern faint blue and yellow tints in PP, these correlate with the grain boundaries but it is unclear what is causing the tint.