Finding the mass of our Galaxy and the number of stars in it.

  • Thread starter Thread starter seizureboi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Galaxy Mass Stars
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves estimating the mass of the Milky Way Galaxy based on the rotation of the sun around its center and determining the number of stars within it, assuming a uniform mass distribution. The context is astrophysics, specifically relating to gravitational dynamics and stellar populations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calculations made by the original poster, including the conversion of time to seconds and the application of gravitational formulas. Questions arise regarding the validity of the assumptions made about mass distribution and the implications for the estimated number of stars.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing feedback on the original poster's calculations and questioning the assumptions about the galaxy's mass distribution. Some participants suggest that the original poster's results may not align with current estimates of stellar populations, indicating a productive exploration of the topic.

Contextual Notes

There is an ongoing debate about the assumptions of uniform mass distribution versus the actual structure of the galaxy, which is more disk-like. This discrepancy is noted as a significant factor in the calculations being discussed.

seizureboi
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The sun rotates around the center of the Milky Way Galaxy at a distance of about 30,000 light-years from the center (1 light year=9.5x10^15 meters). If it takes about 200 million years to make one rotation, estimate the mass of our Galaxy. Assume that the mass distribution of our Galaxy is concentrated mostly in a central uniform sphere. If all the stars had about the mass of our sun (2x10^30 kg), how many stars would there be in our Galaxy?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



For the mass of the Galaxy I got 3.44425x10^41 and I got a total of 1.72213x10^11 stars. I don't think these answers are correct. HELP!?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
172 billion stars looks pretty close. How did you get those answers, and why do you think they're wrong?
 
Turns out I am right. What I did was first convert 200,000,000 years to seconds which gave me 6.3072x10^15 seconds/revolution around the center of the galaxy. Then I plugged the given items into the formula (4pi^2r^3)/(GxT^2), where "r" stands for radius (2.85x10^20), "G" standing for the gravitational constant (6.67x10^-11), and "T" standing for the period (6.3072x10^15). This gave me the mass of the galaxy (3.44425x10^41) and then I took that number and divided it by the mass of the sun since the question says to assume the mass of all other stars to be the same as the sun's, thus giving me the amount of stars in the galaxy (1.72213x10^11).
 
Exactly correct method - however if you count the number of stars in the galaxy it's <10% of this.
We are trying to work out what the rest of the dark mass is.
 
Actually, 172 billion is pretty close to the number of stars in the galaxy. The reason the OP didn't get 10 times this value is because the question assumes the mass of the galaxy is uniformly distributed in a spherical fashion. That's dead wrong: the galaxy is more like a disk than a sphere, and a disk doesn't behave as if all its mass is concentrated at its geometrical center.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
5K