Is anything falling into a black hole *now*?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the nature of time and observation related to black holes, particularly focusing on whether anything is falling into a black hole "now" from the perspective of an external observer. The scope includes theoretical implications of relativity, observational effects, and interpretations of black hole physics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants reference Wikipedia's claim that time stops at the event horizon for external observers, questioning its accuracy and implications.
  • One participant suggests that the concept of "now" is relative and depends on the observer's position relative to the black hole.
  • Another participant explains that while a free-falling observer crosses the event horizon, their emitted photons directed outward become "frozen" and cannot be detected by external observers.
  • There is a discussion about the relativity of simultaneity and how it affects the perception of time for observers at different distances from the black hole.
  • Some participants argue that it may not be decidable whether a black hole forms for an external observer, referencing another thread for further context.
  • One participant introduces the concept of Hawking radiation and its implications for the lifetime of black holes, suggesting a more complex understanding of the black hole's nature.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the interpretation of time at the event horizon and the implications for observation. There is no consensus on the accuracy of Wikipedia's claims or the nature of black hole formation as perceived by external observers.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in defining time dilation and the coordinate systems used to describe black holes, indicating that interpretations may vary based on the chosen framework.

ith
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Hi. Wikipedia says, that for the external observer, time stops at the event horizon.

Is then, for the external observer, anything falling below the event horizon? Or rather, every piece of matter stops before the horizon?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
I was just wondering the same thing myself.
 
Your emphasis on *now* suggests that you haven't wrapped your head around the relativity of simultaneity.

In any case, if I jump into a black hole and my watch reads 12:00 the moment I cross the event horizon, then no matter how long you wait, you will never see through your telescope that reading on my watch... unless you jump into the black hole after me.
 
ith said:
Hi. Wikipedia says, that for the external observer, time stops at the event horizon

Can you point me to the page? It's wrong and needs to be changed.
 
@Hurkyl
By "now" I mean "now for any observer around, that is reasonably far from the event horizon, and for whom the black hole's center is mostly stationary".

So if you jump into a black hole, then you are seen a bit redder. After a year, you produce a very long wave radiation only, and your watch shows 11:59:00 to the surroundings. After the next 1000 years, your watch shows 11:59:59. Billions of years from now, and you are still very faintly visible to anyone around, your clock showing faint 11:59:59.99.

So, in effect, for most of folks in the galaxy around, you will never fall into the black hole in the physically foreseable future, whatever it would mean? And, for the same folks, the black hole, once formed, stops to consume anything, but only produces a shell around it of anything that falls into it?

@twofish-quant
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_hole
 
Oh well, so it is already answered in another thread ?t=463880, I do not post a full link as I am not allowed to do that by this forum.

Someone claims there that it is not even decidable if the black hole forms at all for the external observer.
 
Why is this so bad:

Wikipedia says, that for the external observer, time stops at the event horizon

Can you point me to the page? It's wrong and needs to be changed.

I've seen essentially that one liner many places. Maybe "appears to stop" would be better ...but it is what a distant observer observers.


The best physical interpretation is that, although we can never actually see someone fall through the event horizon (due to the infinite redshift), he really does. As the free-falling observer passes across the event horizon, any inward directed photons emitted by him continue inward toward the center of the black hole. Any outward directed photons emitted by him at the instant he passes across the event horizon are forever frozen there. So, the outside observer cannot detect any of these photons, whether directed inward or outward.

There's no coordinate-independent way to define the time dilation at various distances from the horizon—a clock is ticking relative to coordinate time, so even if that rate approaches zero in Schwarzschild coordinates which are the most common ones to use for a nonrotating black hole, in a different coordinate system like Kruskal-Szekeres coordinates it wouldn't approach zero at the horizon. The Schwarzschild singularity at r = 2M (the event horizon) is a coordinate singularity, not a real, physical singularity. So a free falling observer passes right through that spherical surface without even being able to observe it.

Kip Thorne says (Lecture in 1993 Warping Spacetime, at Stephan Hawking's 60th birthday celebration, Cambridge, England,)

...The flow of time slows to a crawl near the horizon, and beneath the horizon time becomes so highly warped that it flows in a direction you would have thought was spacial: it flows downward towards the singularity. That downward flow, in fact, is why nothing can escape from a black hole. Everything is always drawn inexorably towards the future, and since the future inside a black hole is downward, away from the horizon, nothing can escape back upward, through the horizon.
 
Any outward directed photons emitted by him at the instant he passes across the event horizon are forever frozen there. So, the outside observer cannot detect any of these photons, whether directed inward or outward.
There is no "outside". The emitter could define something which could be described as "outside", but it leads towards the center, too.However, this becomes more interesting together with a finite lifetime of black holes due to Hawking radiation.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
4K