Manchot
- 470
- 5
9%? How does it even keep its crystalline structure?
This discussion highlights recent noteworthy physics papers published in respected peer-reviewed journals within the last three months. Key papers include "New Determination of the Fine Structure Constant from the Electron g Value and QED" by Gabrielse et al., which presents the most accurate measurement of the fine structure constant, and "Violation of Kirchhoff's Laws for a Coherent RC Circuit" by Gabelli et al., which explores new behaviors in quantum circuits. Other significant works discussed include studies on pebble erosion, CP-violation tests, and the interplay of electron-lattice interactions in superconductivity. Each paper is accompanied by its full reference and abstract, emphasizing their contributions to the field.
PREREQUISITESResearchers, physicists, and students in the fields of condensed matter physics, quantum mechanics, and materials science will benefit from this discussion, particularly those interested in recent advancements in experimental physics and theoretical implications.
actionintegral said:Why just a thread? Wouldn't this make a good category?
Fundamental constant is pretty much constant
The idea that fundamental constants do not actually stay constant over space and time has long played on the mind of physicists. But by looking at how a distant galaxy has absorbed the light from a quasar, researchers in Australia have obtained a new limit on how much one fundamental constant -- the ratio of the electron and proton masses -- is changing with time. Their result, which is 10 times more accurate than previous measurements, gives the thumbs up to our current understanding of physics (Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 240801).
In an intriguing and illustrative report on page 1890 of this issue, Parigi et al. (3) present the results of a laboratory demonstration of what happens in the quantum mechanical operations of photon creation and annihilation, which lacks commutativity. These authors add a single photon to a light beam, which corresponds to the action of the standard quantum mechanical creation operator â. They can also subtract a single photon from the light beam, which corresponds to the annihilation operator a.
Parigi et al. measure the quantum mechanical state of a thermal light field after performing these two operations on it, and they show that the final state depends on the order in which the operations are performed. This result is a striking confirmation of the lack of commutativity of quantum mechanical operators. Moreover, the authors present the strongly counterintuitive result that, under certain conditions, the removal of a photon from a light field can lead to an increase in the mean number of photons in that light field, as predicted earlier.